Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-spam law may benefit some e-marketers
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 01/02/04 | Carrie Kirby

Posted on 01/02/2004 6:33:41 PM PST by Holly_P

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The nation's first anti-spam law took effect Thursday, but that doesn't mean e-mail boxes throughout the nation will be free of offers for "herbal Viagra" or travel bargains today.

Far from being pushed out of business, several Bay Area e-mail marketing firms said they expect to prosper under the new law, known as the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: canspam; spam

1 posted on 01/02/2004 6:33:41 PM PST by Holly_P
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Pssst!

This law (??) only applies to American companies, does it not?

99%+ of SPAM comes lately from Red-China!

Do you think they give a dammed about our stinking SPAM laws?

Hip-hip-horray?
2 posted on 01/02/2004 6:49:11 PM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
South Korea




10.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

3 posted on 01/02/2004 6:49:14 PM PST by Support Free Republic (I'd rather be sleeping. Let's get this over with so I can go back to sleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Pssst!

This law (??) only applies to American companies, does it not?

99%+ of SPAM comes lately from Red-China!

Do you think they give a dammed about our stinking SPAM laws?

Hip-hip-horray?
4 posted on 01/02/2004 6:49:20 PM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
I've been fighting with SPAM filters for years. No matter how I configured the filter some would still get through. It was a losing battle. About 3 weeks ago I switched tactics. I deleted all my SPAM filters and just let it all go straight into the Inbox. I then set up new filters to redirect the emails I expect to see from friends, family, etc. Not a single SPAM gets into my real email buckets and I just glance at and trash the inbox daily.
5 posted on 01/02/2004 7:22:38 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
One thing companies should be aware of is that the new law puts liability on the company whose products are actually being advertised, not the e-mail advertising company, Ward said.

This is the only good part (if true!) Everything else in this law is protection for the SPAMmers.

6 posted on 01/02/2004 7:27:40 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Is this article correct in that the federal law supercedes (does this mean voids) any State laws? Does it in effect establish a federal right to send unsolicited mail?
7 posted on 01/02/2004 9:11:52 PM PST by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: azcap
Does it in effect establish a federal right to send unsolicited mail?

That's the way I read it.

Some states already had stricter laws but this one tops all of them.

9 posted on 01/02/2004 9:18:50 PM PST by Holly_P
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson