But the point is: contraband weapons were found at both sites -- the only difference was scale. The Guardian, though, chose to minimize the weapons, so as to focus on the American "mistreatment" of the "innocent" natives. AFP, confronted with a much larger trove of weaponry, chose to play it straight.
Had the Guardian and AFP swapped event coverage, I suspect both reports would have used to propagandize against the American effort (the Guardian having no sense of proportion).