Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz
Second hand smoke can aggravate some pre-existing conditions and as hospitals being "health care" facilities it is understandable for them to impose restrictions - but still does not justify government mandated bans.

I see. So, the restrictions on liberty here need to be weighed against the health issues (aggravation of some pre-existing conditions) that would be faced by some hospital patients.

I take it, though, that you don't see it as a legitimate function of government to weigh these factors, am I right? Are you saying that these decisions should be left to private hospitals and doctors' offices to decide for themselves?

74 posted on 01/02/2004 9:57:20 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Scenic Sounds
I take it, though, that you don't see it as a legitimate function of government to weigh these factors, am I right? Are you saying that these decisions should be left to private hospitals and doctors' offices to decide for themselves?

If it is a government run hospital, it is the government's job. In private facilities it should be left up to the facilities. Just like any other business.

76 posted on 01/02/2004 10:01:00 AM PST by Gabz (smoke gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business -swat'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson