Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can I Buy You a Drink and Light Your Cigarette? (Cathryn Crawford)
The Washington Dispatch ^ | January 2, 2004 | Cathryn Crawford

Posted on 01/02/2004 8:44:44 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last
To: Cathryn Crawford
In what dictionary do you find the word, bartend?
121 posted on 01/02/2004 11:37:00 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
You can't even get those people to empty the bedpans, let alone the ashtrays.
122 posted on 01/02/2004 11:40:53 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Smoke kills germs, the stink is in the nose of the besmeller.
123 posted on 01/02/2004 11:44:35 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Ever get this feeling of late? LOL...

It just drives me crazy to see adults having to go outside to light a cigarette. Although I am not a smoker, we continue to treat smokers as second class citizens.

The most bothersome thing of all is that all this money that was going to be collected by the States from the cigarette companies never went where it was intended. The trial lawyers got their fill, as did the States. Extortion at the highest level.

My father used to smoke a pipe, and I loved the smell. It meant that dad was home in the evening. There was such a comfort to those of us in the family. (Dad died several years ago, but it wasn't tobacco related...) Unfortunately now the stigma is there for all smokers, that they are considered not worthy to smoke in most establishments.

I like the fact that Peter Jackson had the hobbits, and Aragorn smoking pipes in the LOTR movies. Didn't hear much from the PC crowd about that. Thank Goodness!

124 posted on 01/02/2004 11:44:55 AM PST by Northern Yankee ( Freedom needs a soldier...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
If the average pot-smoker smoked as many joints per day as the average cigarette smoker smokes, he would have been a hood ornament on a city bus years ago.
125 posted on 01/02/2004 11:50:35 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
The most bothersome thing of all is that all this money that was going to be collected by the States from the cigarette companies never went where it was intended. The trial lawyers got their fill, as did the States. Extortion at the highest level.

Oh boy! I must make you see the light here!  The Tobacco Settlement money is NOT being paid for by Big Tobacco and NOT the state governments.  That money is paid solely by smokers in the state that pay taxes on cigarettes!

Why do you think they keep bumping the cigarette tax?  To bleed more money out of us!

And when the smokers get smart and order offline or roll their own, they are not paying into the state coffers anymore.  So.......what does the state do?  They raise taxes on cigarettes to make up for the loss. Then, they also use this money to control, restrict and ban the smokers!  Yet, their paychecks are being paid for by the MSA money, which is paid for by smokers who pay taxes on cigarettes!

Its like this:


126 posted on 01/02/2004 12:12:45 PM PST by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
If the average pot-smoker smoked as many joints per day as the average cigarette smoker smokes, he would have been a hood ornament on a city bus years ago.


127 posted on 01/02/2004 12:13:26 PM PST by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
TOBACCO NEWCOMERS????!!!!!

Yes, your arguments vis-a-vis tobacco smoking and freedom are reminiscent of the things we've been arguing vis-a-vis marijuana smoking and freedom for years now. Welcome to the club.

128 posted on 01/02/2004 12:20:48 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Yes, your arguments vis-a-vis tobacco smoking and freedom are reminiscent of the things we've been arguing vis-a-vis marijuana smoking and freedom for years now. Welcome to the club.

Yes! But tobacco has always been a legal commodity.

129 posted on 01/02/2004 12:29:14 PM PST by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Yes! But tobacco has always been a legal commodity.

So was cannabis up until 1937. Your point?

130 posted on 01/02/2004 12:31:54 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I fully agree. You can smoke in my bar anytime.
131 posted on 01/02/2004 12:42:32 PM PST by Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Nice work Cathryn.

Now, watch the Crusade on fat people roll.

Same arguments, similar legislation.

If the health effects of smoking are detrimental to the work place vis a vis health care cost and loss productivity, the same arguments will hold water for obesity...whatever the final definition of obesity may be.

The IRS already got the ball rolling by defining obesity as a disease, and allowing peole to deduct diet plans, helth club memberships, etc. from their taxes.
132 posted on 01/02/2004 12:51:15 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
But tobacco has always been a legal commodity.

Not true - it was illegal in many states in the late 19th and early 20th century, even up to the years of prohibition.

133 posted on 01/02/2004 12:54:18 PM PST by Gabz (smoke gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business -swat'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I do sympatize...

I have been educated. Thanks for the enlightened (Pun intended?) view.

This whole thing has smelled fishy from the start. I do know that alot of smokers head over to our local indian gaming casinoes to buy cigarettes that are tax free.

It seems as though the Clinton administration went after "Big Tobacco" because they had failed miserably in the drug enforcement area.

134 posted on 01/02/2004 12:57:14 PM PST by Northern Yankee ( Freedom needs a soldier...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Same arguments, similar legislation.

But you forgot to mention same players and same money.

Not only are some of the sharks, oops I mean lawyers, that have started the lawsuits against the fast food chains the same ones that targetted the tobacco industry, they are bragging about how they are using that experience and money to get the next ball rolling.

Additionally, the RWJFoundation is kicking money into that battle and also against the alcohol industry.

135 posted on 01/02/2004 12:58:21 PM PST by Gabz (smoke gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business -swat'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Public health...don't even get me started on those types.

Reminds me of the movie Demolition Man. Everything is illegal....caffine, uneduational toys, guns, meat, salt, swearing.

136 posted on 01/02/2004 1:52:06 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("You will not hear me cry. I do not sing the blues.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Can I Buy You a Drink and Light Your Cigarette?

And speaking of which, I'll take a Guinness. Thanks.

137 posted on 01/02/2004 1:53:58 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("You will not hear me cry. I do not sing the blues.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poser
I love smokers. Every time they buy a pack of cigarettes, they pay a few dollars tax that I won't have to pay. Thank you guys.

I haven't bought a pack of cigarettes for twelve years ... but I still smoke 10-20 cigarettes a day.

138 posted on 01/02/2004 2:10:02 PM PST by TigersEye ("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Until smoking is banned altogether, the decisions regarding the right to smoke in privately owned businesses should be left up to the individual discretion of the owner. Otherwise, choice is removed and replaced with full control by the government, which invalidates the entire idea of private ownership.

Makes sense to me!

139 posted on 01/02/2004 2:32:42 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
No assumption deserves priority. Science is divided on the effects of second hand smoke.

Read the entire sentence and you'll see that I wasn't dicussing the assumpution - I was discussing which one of the following options deserved priority.

140 posted on 01/02/2004 2:57:43 PM PST by Cathryn Crawford (¿Podemos ahora sonreír?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson