[CWOJackson]

Strange...the fail to mention his opposition to our defending ourselves in Iraq.

[BlkConserv]

I'm sure President Bush is shaking in his boots, after all he may lose a half-dozen votes to malcontents calling themselves "conservatives" who generate pent-up anger and frustration because Bush isn't conservative enough.

The only way these people will be satisfied is if one of the Founders can be somehow magically brought back to life and run for President again.

[The_Eaglet]

I haven't seen where he rejects defense. In fact, this statement from Politics1 indicates that Peroutka supports our troups,

" He opposed the US action in Iraq on constitutional grounds: `It's not that Congress doesn't have the authority to declare war. It's just that it hasn't done so.' However, he emphasizes that he strongly supported the US troops in Iraq while opposing 'the unconstitutional procedures under which they were committed to fight.'"

[Chris Tucker]

Both the Constitution and Libertarian parties were/are against the war in Iraq and protecting America from radical Muslims.

I'm concerned about Bush's failure to outline an aggressive, conservative domestic policy and I do hope he does so in his upcoming SOTU address. But voting 3rd party in this critical election year is clearly not an option.