Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
The deficit went up under Reagan. Spending went up under Reagan.The welfare rolls went up under Reagan.Government INCREASED under Reagan.Reagan signed BLANKET AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS . Regan did absolutely NOTHING to stop/curb abortions.And, Reagan did less than NOTHING to bring us back to living under ONLY the Constitution, whilst he served two terms as president. Nope, wipe Ronnie off your " little list " of who's Conservative enough for you.

You live in an hallucinary world of your own making.You're blinders hold reality at bay.You'd strave to death, or die of thirst, before you would accept a 1/2 a laof of bread or a glass of liquid, that wasn't the brand or exact thing you thought best, because it wasn't 100%...just 50% of it.

Okay, so you don't vote, sit it all out waaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttting for yourf prince to come.Yeah, sleeping beauty, that's the ticket...NOT!

134 posted on 01/02/2004 6:49:04 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
Except perhaps for Reagan, and he had an opposing Congress. What's Bush's excuse?

You got all of that rant out of this one statement? I said 'perhaps' for Reagan. I didn't give him immediate praise. But you keep stretching. Keep defending the education spending, the healthcare spending, and all the other non-defense spending as conservative actions

Okay, so you don't vote, sit it all out waaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttting for yourf prince to come.Yeah, sleeping beauty, that's the ticket...NOT!

Never said I would sit out 2004. No I will vote. And it will be for the conservative candidate. Perhaps this gentleman whose candidacy started the thread. Don't know. The Southern Party doesn't run national candidates. But they do that for a reason

135 posted on 01/02/2004 6:57:56 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons; billbears
You distort the truth. Besides a brief period of control of only one one house of congress, the Reagan presidency did not have control of the congress and thus was at the mercy of their purse strings. His policies caused an INCREASE in revenue and it was congress that spent that surplus rather than shrink govt.

Bush controls BOTH houses of congress, what is his excuse for the spending increases?

137 posted on 01/02/2004 7:21:31 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson