Michael Peroutka Announces Presidential Campaign (December 15)

Radio Liberty and Others ^ | 1/1/2004 | Adam Valle

[nunya bidness]

I didn't call you names, I didn't personally attack you, and you're behaving exactly like Howard Dean. If you can't take the heat on FR, then don't post or read it; or just ignore the posts that so offend and hurt you. You like to dish it out, but can't take even a wee smidgen of it back. TOUGH !

As usual, I have to add, "And your little dog too!"

Stay away from the garden hose. It's connected to the hosebib in the Bohemian Grove.

[4Freedom]

BTTT!

I'm not certain I'll be voting for who you're voting for, but I'm certain I'm not voting for Bush.

Gridlock was better than what we have now.

[JustAnAmerican]

"What makes you think we're 'fringe?' Independents are the fastest growing group in the country".

That deserves repeating over and over. In fact I dare say Independents are at 33 percent of the voting population soon to be the majority of the voting public.

[The_Eaglet]

Welcome to the new 'conservative' party. Where to be called conservative you just have to be a shade less liberal than your opponent. Oh, and have a R by your name.

Don't forget the so-called conservatives who add new socialistic federal programs, going beyond the liberalism of their Democratic predecessors.

[The_Eaglet]

Bush had a golden opportunity after 9/11 to cut gov't size and spending. He has done neither - non-defense spending is through the roof and Bush has yet to veto a single bill.

And this makes him "conservative" how?

[furball4paws]

Phooey!. There's little practical difference between D's and R's, except the Dems head towards Socialism faster. Over time, both will deliver us to the state. Their selfish interests in power and holding a powerful and great paying job with really lucrative benefits and ego boosting TV time make this progression inevitable. And then they pile on laws that make it impossible for the "citizen legislator" to have a chance. Maybe gridlock ain't so bad after all.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

The extremists actually believe that "conservatives" will make a comeback after they break the Republican party and the DUmocrats have full control of the Supreme Court, the legislation, all government, gun confiscation, etc.....

simply use your imagination of the irreversible damage a DUmocrat (Socialist/Marxist) controlled government would create. I know, I have a brilliant strategy to teach those Publikians a lesson, lets all fall on our swords! That'll teach 'em!

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Yes, independents do vote on a centrist view point, not extreme left, left, extreme right, Constitutionalist, isolationist, or Protectionist.

President Bush will get that vote because he offers a middle ground solution. Quite brilliant really.

[The_Eaglet]

He will be there with Justice Roy Moore, Alan Keyes, Jim Clymer and Howard Phillips.

I wish I could go. I am interested in what they all have to say.

[billbears]

simply use your imagination of the irreversible damage a DUmocrat (Socialist/Marxist) controlled government would create

Who needs to imagine? It's right in front of us. If you were to tell me ten years ago that one of the parties was in control and passed massive spending bills in the name of education and healthcare, I couldn't be convinced that a Republican not only signed it, but signed it gleefully. 'We' are in control of the House, the Senate, and the White House. What's the excuse? The people want it? It gets 'us' more votes? I thought 'conservatives' didn't run the government based on polls. That's the standard accusation, among many, about Clinton. He ran the nation by polls. Mind you, Clinton was worse morally but after seeing two years of the Republican party in control of every part of government, I'm not so sure a logjam isn't the best solution between the two parties. 10-15 years from now when this all starts to come back and bite the citizens of the respective states, namely in their wallets, don't blame Democrats. This fiasco should be laid solely at the feet of the Republican party.

[The_Eaglet]

Personally I haven't seen you make a rational argument yet. I bring up Bush II's expansion of the national government through excessive spending. Unconstitutional expenditures under the Republican party.

I certainly didn't see him recommend any other alternatives to stopping the socialism and/or unconstitional activity perpetuated by the Bush administration.

[The_Eaglet]

One year ago, President Bush stood before the United Nations General Assembly and pledged that the United States of America would return to UNESCO as a symbol of our nation's commitment to human dignity

...A UNESCO (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) document, entitled "Unwanted Pregnancy and Unsafe Abortion," calls for sweeping government reform to make abortion available to all women and adolescent girls without restriction, going as far as to suggest that governments should subsidize abortions and offer "redress" to women who have been "denied" access to abortions "that should be made available to them."

It sounds like Bush doesn't consider UNESCO's affronts to the dignity of the unborn as a problem.
We don't need any presidents supporting this nonsense, especially those that claim to be pro-life.
Click here to view the Constitution Party platform on the sanctity of life.

[nopardons]

Oh yeah...they've really " taught " the GOP so much, in the past and " saved " America from the horridness of a re-elected x41, by helping to install Clinton. Just imagine how much better America would be, if Dean were presidxent, or Hillary, or.......

After all, they sleep soooooooooooooo much better, clutching their " principles " to their chests, as Dems rob them blind, ignore terrorist problems,give away our secrets, deplete our military and weapons, place activist judges in all courts, and trample all over their rights. LOL

[GeronL]

yay

[GeronL]

Constitution Party should be more pro-war, cuz we have NO CHOICE but to fight.

otherwise, I am usually with them.

[GeronL]

I love the idea of the Constitution Party and I do NOT consider myself a Republican... but..

I bet it ticked him off when Saddam's capture kicked his announcement off the top of the news

It would have to be a NO NEWS day for this announcement to be in the top of the news.

[GeronL]

It is difficult to do that, when some would rather vote fringe party than GOP. When some Conservatives go fringe, they only help the Dems! That does less than nothing,on every level, to roll back what the Dems have spent decades installing!

and calling them names is the best way to get them back?? I doubt it.

[GeronL]

Why don't you guys field some candidates for Congressional races instead of focusing on the Presidency, who is just a figurehead for the Executive Branch anyway? In

Now thats constructive. Unlike those who just like to name call, and I agree with you. We should be focused on running a few people for Congress in districts where they will get attention and in ones they might win, then they will act as the consience of conservatives in the US House... although probably sitting in the GOP side.

[nopardons]

The PURIST and UNAPPEASABLES, here, won't ever " come back " and they call the rest of us names regularly.

Other than fringers, unappeasables, and purists ( all descriptive terms and NOT name calling at all !), just WHAT names have I been guilty of calling them ? NONE , through great restraint, I assure you. :-)

[Clemenza]

I'm sure he will make this a "close race" like the McIdiot/Jeb race in 2002. /sarcasm