Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Peroutka Announces Presidential Campaign (December 15)
Radio Liberty and Others ^ | 1/1/2004 | Adam Valle

Posted on 01/01/2004 9:48:48 PM PST by The_Eaglet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last
An earlier interview from the Jan Mickelson Show features Peroutka commenting on current issues.
1 posted on 01/01/2004 9:48:49 PM PST by The_Eaglet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nopardons
A ping before the swarm. :)
2 posted on 01/01/2004 9:50:26 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
Strange...the fail to mention his opposition to our defending ourselves in Iraq.
3 posted on 01/01/2004 9:50:56 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
No mention of Iraq. Of 9-11. Of Afghanistan. Of our life and death struggle with the Islamonazis. Pathetic.

We are a nation at war. This is a time for serious people. We don't have the time to waste on third-party vanity candidates. Wait several years until the grown-ups solve the big problems, then idiots like this guy can get back in the sandbox to play.
4 posted on 01/01/2004 9:57:35 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
On December 15, 2003, Michael Peroutka announced his candidacy for the Constitution Party presidential nomination.

(Guffaw!) On the day after Saddam's capture?

Why don't he just announce his candidacy when the New Years ball drop from Times Square?

5 posted on 01/01/2004 9:59:42 PM PST by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inkling
I had to go to the party website to find out he's opposed to our defending ourselves in Iraq...but of course he supports our troops.
6 posted on 01/01/2004 10:01:53 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
"On the day after Saddam's capture?"

I bet it ticked him off when Saddam's capture kicked his announcement off the top of the news.

7 posted on 01/01/2004 10:03:22 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'm sure President Bush is shaking in his boots, after all he may lose a half-dozen votes to malcontents calling themselves "conservatives" who generate pent-up anger and frustration because Bush isn't conservative enough.

The only way these people will be satisfied is if one of the Founders can be somehow magically brought back to life and run for President again.

8 posted on 01/01/2004 10:05:41 PM PST by BlkConserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson; nopardons; onyx
On the day after Saddam's capture?" I bet it ticked him off when Saddam's capture kicked his announcement off the top of the news.

He probably thinks W had Saddam on ice, waiting to ruin his announcement. Constitution Party, right..

9 posted on 01/01/2004 10:06:34 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Oh great, the political party,which has even less supporters than the FLAT EARTH SOCIETY has members is touting it's newest " leader " ? LOL
10 posted on 01/01/2004 10:08:08 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlkConserv
LOL! Somehow I doubt even one of the original founders would live up to their expectations.
11 posted on 01/01/2004 10:08:42 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
Some of his ideas are very admirable. I agree we'd be better off adhering more to the Constitution.

But not now. We've many other things much more important. Like preventing The Hildabeaste's assault on the White House.

12 posted on 01/01/2004 10:10:44 PM PST by upchuck (This tag line will self-destruct in five seconds. 5.... 4.... 3.... 2.... 1.... DISOLVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I haven't seen where he rejects defense. In fact, this statement from Politics1 indicates that Peroutka supports our troups,

" He opposed the US action in Iraq on constitutional grounds: `It's not that Congress doesn't have the authority to declare war. It's just that it hasn't done so.' However, he emphasizes that he strongly supported the US troops in Iraq while opposing 'the unconstitutional procedures under which they were committed to fight.'"

13 posted on 01/01/2004 10:11:26 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
Thanks for posting. Read through it and can't find much I disagree with. We have the Constitution Party here in NC, however I do belong to the Southern Party officially now. May be a candidate I would back in the Presidential election
14 posted on 01/01/2004 10:11:30 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
Sheesh - you have to include every state in the topic list?
15 posted on 01/01/2004 10:12:35 PM PST by flashbunny (A corrupt society has many laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
experience as an attorney

This is enough to NOT get a vote from me.

16 posted on 01/01/2004 10:12:52 PM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet
LOL! Congress did authorize the President to act, and he did. But I'm glad to hear he supports the troops...so do the dems who are also opposed to defending ourselves.
17 posted on 01/01/2004 10:13:43 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
The whole point is that these flakes are just KOOKS, who attract other unstable KOOKS, who need massive injections of common sense and reality.
18 posted on 01/01/2004 10:14:09 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Both the Constitution and Libertarian parties were/are against the war in Iraq and protecting America from radical Muslims.

I'm concerned about Bush's failure to outline an aggressive, conservative domestic policy and I do hope he does so in his upcoming SOTU address. But voting 3rd party in this critical election year is clearly not an option.

19 posted on 01/01/2004 10:14:32 PM PST by Chris Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chris Tucker
Totally agreed...however I'm sure that the DNC does appreciate any support it can get.
20 posted on 01/01/2004 10:15:48 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson