To: Quix; John H K
"Which aspect of the government in what context and what set of contingencies with what goal(s) in mind amidst what other global goings on?"
Federal,State and Local authorities,in the context of whatever sensors they have giving a hint of the eruption-if thats what it would be called-about a week before it is expected to happen,the goal of saving thousands of lives with the current state of global goings on.
I am honestly not sure what the powers-that-be would do,given that "crowd control" is Job 1 for them typically.
373 posted on
01/02/2004 6:29:42 AM PST by
John W
To: John W
Thanks.
I think the crowd control issue is a complex and certainly serious one.
But I think there's no choice but for the government to attempt at least some migration from the most critical, nearer regions.
Then there are all those stories of the concentration camps built and ready for inmates on abandoned military bases in the West.
And, what if we are in the midst of the road of another set of national emergencies at the time. What if the government is ALREADY too tasked to hardly even more than blanch at the new crisis?
But how could a government stand which was shown to have known of a coming cataclysm and said nothing?
. . . apart from martial law and Beijing like control.
402 posted on
01/02/2004 9:26:10 AM PST by
Quix
(Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
To: John W; Quix; John H K
Our government already has stated they would not give any warning if an asteroid was on course to destroy civilization. Presumably the same protocol is in place for a Yellowstone eruption.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson