O.K.
This explains why the trout aren't biting this year at Yellowstone.
1 posted on
01/01/2004 8:33:27 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: Happy2BMe
Uh oh.
449 posted on
01/02/2004 3:12:13 PM PST by
hershey
To: Happy2BMe
Major UH OH.
459 posted on
01/02/2004 3:31:24 PM PST by
Merdoug
To: Happy2BMe
466 posted on
01/02/2004 3:50:05 PM PST by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back ...)
To: Happy2BMe
600,000 year eruption cycle. The last blow was 640,000 years ago. I think we could be in deep doo doo. We are living on borrowed time.
474 posted on
01/02/2004 4:29:45 PM PST by
jetson
To: Happy2BMe
bump
490 posted on
01/02/2004 7:13:38 PM PST by
VOA
To: Happy2BMe
This is crap. Large does not mean more powerful. The eleviation of stress across such a large expanse is more likely to lessen the impact rather than intensify it. This sounds alarmist on the one hand - as touching the evidence of an eruption. Hot water and high ground temperature is just part of the equation. What about miniquakes? What is the acid level of the nearby lake being affected? What is happening to the magnetic field in and around the area?
It cannot be said that a valcano erupted 600,000 plus years ago in the area as there is no objective proof of this. It may be that a valcano erupted in the area at some time in the past; but that is as much as one can truthfully say with any precision. That one has occured in the past is all that is needed to be known. Pressure build up does not rely on time - it relies on a root cause that cannot be accurately stated as this is not a typical lava dome.
The idea of supervalcanos is a new "theory" that has come into vogue. The only thing they are going on in this case is speculation as they've never actually seen one before in action much less state with any degree of certainty that one has ever existed before. I've seen writeups on this in the last few years along with specials on vulcanology that discussed the theory of supervalcanoes.
Further study and an abundance of the kind of caution that goes with any event developing of this type is the only thing I see is neccessary. I smell science looking for more excuses to bang alarm bells and beg for government funds.
512 posted on
01/02/2004 9:25:17 PM PST by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Happy2BMe
I am 200 miles away. I hope I finish reading my book first.
514 posted on
01/02/2004 9:33:34 PM PST by
Big Horn
(A waist is a terrible thing to mind.)
To: Happy2BMe
When Yellowstone does blow, some geologists predict that every living thing within six hundred miles is likely to die.Man, I do not consider this a very good thing. This could make the Iranian earthquake look like a traffic accident.
To: Happy2BMe
This explains why the trout aren't biting this year at Yellowstone.'cause they are already cooked!
Just grab Your Mess Kits and head for the water.
590 posted on
01/04/2004 2:24:31 PM PST by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: Happy2BMe
Yellowstone just had an earthquake. About 4.5 Not good!
616 posted on
01/07/2004 10:04:46 AM PST by
Merdoug
To: Happy2BMe
.
624 posted on
01/21/2004 11:54:54 PM PST by
Happy2BMe
(Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
To: Happy2BMe
Look at it this way...
1) It will kill off a lot of hippies.
2) It will solve the snowmobile debate.
3) It will give us something exciting to concentrate on besides seeing Kerry implode.
bttt
January 2004 article.
630 posted on
01/02/2009 2:10:51 PM PST by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson