Skip to comments.
Scientists closely monitoring Yellowstone. 200 degree ground temperatures reported.
Idaho Observer ^
Posted on 01/01/2004 8:33:27 PM PST by Happy2BMe
-
Scientists Closely
Monitoring Yellowstone
ProLiberty.com
12-23-3
-
-
- Recent eruptions, 200 degree ground temperatures, bulging magma and 84 degree water temperatures prompt heightened srutiny of park's geothermal activity...
-
- BILLINGS, Mont. -- Yellowstone National Park happens to be on top of one of the largest "super volcanoes" in the world. Geologists claim the Yellowstone Park area has been on a regular eruption cycle of 600,000 years. The last eruption was 640,000 years ago making the next one long overdue. This next eruption could be 2,500 times the size of the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption. Volcanologists have been tracking the movement of magma under the park and have calculated that, in parts of Yellowstone, the ground has risen over seventy centimeters this century.
-
- In July, 2003, Yellowstone Park rangers closed the entire Norris Geyser Basin because of deformation of the land and excessive high ground temperatures. There is an area that is 28 miles long by 7 miles wide that has bulged upward over five inches since 1996, and this year the ground temperature on that bulge has reached over 200 degrees (measured one inch below ground level).
-
- There was no choice but to close off the entire area. Everything in this area is dying: The trees, flowers, grass and shrubs. A dead zone is developing and spreading outward. The animals are literally migrating out of the park.
-
- Then during the last part of July one of the Park geologists discovered a huge bulge at the bottom of Yellowstone Lake. The bulge has already risen over 100 feet from the bottom of the lake and the water temperature at the surface of the bulge has reached 88 degrees and is still rising.
-
- Keep in mind that Yellowstone Lake is a high mountain lake with very cold water temperatures. The Lake is now closed to the public. It is filled with dead fish floating everywhere. The same is true of the Yellowstone river and most of the other streams in the Park. Dead and dying fish are filling the water everywhere.
-
- Many of the picnic areas in the Park have been closed and people visiting the Park usually stay but a few hours before leaving since the stench of sulfur is so strong they literally can't stand the smell.
-
- The irony of all this is the silence by the news media and our government. Very little information is available from Yellowstone personnel or publications. What mainstream newsstories do appear underscore the likelihood of a massive volcanic eruption. Though geologists publicly admit Yellowstone is "overdue," they have been quoted as stating another massive magma release may not occur for 100,000 or 2 million years. Others close to the story are convinced that a massive eruption is imminent. A source that has demonstrated first-hand knowledge of the park's history and recent geothermal events stated the following: "The American people are not being told that the explosion of this 'super volcano' could happen at any moment. When Yellowstone does blow, some geologists predict that every living thing within six hundred miles is likely to die. The movement of magma has been detected just three-tenths of a mile below the bulging surface of the ground in Yellowstone raising concerns that this super volcano may erupt soon."
-
-
- This report was taken from a series of articles, emails and official information
- http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20031219.htm
|
TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: caldera; dantespeak; environment; geothermal; he4; helium4; jellystone; lava; magma; supervolcano; volcano; volcanoes; yellowstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 621-630 next last
To: Happy2BMe
The director of Jihad Watch (www.jihadwatch.org), Robert Spencer,... Robert Spencer was a guest on C-Span Saturday morning, and I imagine that radical hate-filled Insane Ibbish wasn't too happy about what he had to say. More Americans need to understand that America is at war with radical Islam.
George W. Bush is just wrong when he states that Islam is a religion of peace.
To: StopGlobalWhining
George W. Bush is just wrong when he states that Islam is a religion of peace. pssssst! He knows better. It's the diplomatic equivalent of saying "Nice Cujo" while loading the shotgun...
562
posted on
01/03/2004 7:14:51 PM PST
by
null and void
(It's a guy thing, we don't understand it either...)
To: null and void
Cute! ROFL
563
posted on
01/03/2004 7:31:30 PM PST
by
punster
To: null and void
Nice Cujo. LOL
564
posted on
01/03/2004 7:38:14 PM PST
by
DeepDish
(I no longer capitalize french or france, only things proper or significant are capitalized.)
To: StopGlobalWhining; Salem; SJackson
"George W. Bush is just wrong when he states that Islam is a religion of peace." Many around here are thinking that when Dubya blasts the whole world in defense of the "Religion of Peace" he is doing so to later come back and "straighten things out."
I'm still waiting for the "straightening things out" part.
(Not hold muh breath.)
565
posted on
01/03/2004 7:55:36 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: drlevy88
I am not going to debate geothermal boring technology on this forum, but there are several major errors in your statement. The first is that a nuclear blast would result in a volcano. You are either overestimating the blast force of a nuclear explosive or underestimating the distance to the magma. You are also grossly overestimating the radioactive loss to the atmosphere of a below ground nuclear blast.
This proposal for a nuclear cascade induced venting has been discussed and analyzed in the academic literature. The basic premise is for a series of sub-ground nuclear blasts to loosen the upper crust sufficiently to let the pressure ooze rather than blow. If this interests you, look it up.
To: drlevy88
No sh!t. We got stuff that is way more entertaining than nukes. Like EMP. And fuel-air bombs. And MOABS. Nukes are..just..so.. passe.
567
posted on
01/03/2004 9:01:38 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: Happy2BMe
Hey, I didn't dismiss the facts or say that activity wasn't happening. If you're upset, you need to learn to read. Any Volcanologist can tell you that pressure, temperature, etc are just part of the picture. There are things that preceed eruptions that happen which are now predictable. What I said is Where are the rest of these things we should be seeing. Yes, I dismiss all this hype about supervolcanoes and the theorizing about that. Precisely because these guys have never seen one before - nor has anyone else. The whole notion on it's face is moronic. And simply because we know what happens in an eruption. The force of a blast has more components than merely how much lava is involved. But back to the earlier point, whether one is coming at all has more components to it than how warm the ground gets.
I'm reminded of the old heating pans that were used in early days to warm a bed. They were small little pockets of heated material that were placed between mattresses or under the bed that would warm the entire bed. The thing absent in the conversation at this point is clarity and common sense. What happens when you put a heater to water in a pool? Is the ground not saturated? How does ground water respond to heat? Does it dissipate it via mechanics of physics? Hmm. Gee, let us think instead of getting worked up. Let's deal with facts instead of hype.
568
posted on
01/04/2004 6:29:35 AM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: mewzilla; Happy2BMe
He's just being flip. He can't read and is throwing a fit because of it apparently. That or he is offended that someone can think for themselves. Who knows. I would be cautious but would be demanding more facts and less hype.
Ignore the Supervolcano theories and zero in on the factors normally seen with vocanic eruptions elsewhere. If they can't establish the standard patterns, I'd not get overly worked up just yet. But note I said "overly". Concern may be warranted; but, to say the thing is going to errupt imminantly is a stretch until all the data is there to say it's going to happen.
569
posted on
01/04/2004 6:43:23 AM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Quix
Bunk. Was a good word earlier, just as good now. C14 was flawed in that it counted on factors that were not so. C14 levels are not constant. What's more, with it not being constant, the only measurement that can be certain with regard to c14 levels in the atmosphere are samples for a given present time where they can actually be measured. The rest is theory - which makes any date arrived at the same: theory. A glorified guess. When they realized it wasn't accurate and came up with something else, they calibrated their something else against c14 meaning that the element of assumption hasn't left the equation. A guess, no matter how technical you try to make it is still a guess.
Let's imagine for a moment that truth in advertising applied to science. There is no way their dating "theories" would stand up in court. And why? Because even short term the results have been shown in error. It's the nature of math, physics and logic that are against you. It doesn't destroy my worldview either way.
570
posted on
01/04/2004 7:00:22 AM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Havoc
Fascinating.
Thanks.
571
posted on
01/04/2004 7:18:49 AM PST
by
Quix
(Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
To: Quix
Always is with your type.
572
posted on
01/04/2004 8:17:13 AM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Quix; mewzilla; Havoc
O.K., okie dokie.
So is it possible that you can explain the 7 x 20 mile Norris Geyser ground temps to this flippant, illiterate, and whatever else you called me before you close the thread?
573
posted on
01/04/2004 8:23:38 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Happy2BMe
Is it possible you could figure out what it is you're protesting so loudly and get back to me. I think I've been quite clear in my stance. And for yourself, the only thing you're accomplishing is coming off looking like an idiot or something which I'll presume you are not. So, recover, reflect and do let us know what you are on about.
574
posted on
01/04/2004 8:47:54 AM PST
by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
To: Havoc
7 x 20 mile Norris Geyser ground temps of 200'F.
Okie dokie.
I'm getting back to you now. With your indescribable knowledge, irrefutable wisdom, and unquestionable technical expertise in volanology, there can be but one who can finally close this very pressing matter - YOU - HAVOC (who else?)
There is but one way, one soultion to ending this ever-pressing question of the end of the world.
Get in your car, go to Yellowstone, go to the Norris geyser area and measure the ground temperatures.
Free us from this great oppression - go - GO NOW!
575
posted on
01/04/2004 8:57:46 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Boot Hill
Nah...
Like almost all else, the 600-mile "kill radius" is a little over-blown, a little conservative, and a very lot "random" in its effects.
Most ash damage will be downwind (almost always from the west-northwest!, and local topography will deflect and direct blast effects. Consider Nagasaki: it got hit with a bigger A-bomb than Hiroshima, but the hills reflects and deflected the blast so the net effects were somewhat less than the "valley" that focused teh energy at Hiroshima.
Bottom line: We don't when this thing will blow, but it is overdue. How much warning do we get? Days? Weeks? Years? Decades?
What will the warnings be like? Are these warnings, or just minor changes in Yellowstone's USUAL volcanic activity? We don't know.
How many early blasts are going to happen? Don't know.
Where and how much ash and dust and gasses get blown out? We don't know.
Will "venting" these gasses prevent it, or reduce its magnitiude, or simply blow the same avmount of gasses over a smaller area for a much longer period of time? Will
Is CAUSING a 150 year continuous eruption the size of Mt St Helen's "better" than a single potentially catastrophic blast that is over in only 15 days? (Remember, all the same amount of energy has to get dispursed: in a single large blast of unknown magnitude, or in looooooooooong series of smaller blasts of unknow magnitude - that might get larger anyway and encourage the single big blast.)
576
posted on
01/04/2004 11:42:01 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Ronaldus Magnus
True.
But the radioactive trash left over from each blast, even if kept deposited underground (that is, the blast DOES NOT cause a complete sudden venting) will still be present.
When the magma and hot rocks that are going to be moved as the pressure is released get to the surface, their radioactive cargo is still going to get carried up, some of which can escape and be released.
Some will be permanently buried in the magma and underground pockets when the magma hardens. But not all will.
And, magma (by definition) is volatile and can get remelted in later eruptions. The lava tunnels in Idaho west of Yellowstone are remnants of these lava flows, and obviously, ALMOST ALL of their contents kept flowing and was released.
577
posted on
01/04/2004 11:48:12 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Rockitz
Oh my Manatee....you are the one for me.....
Name that tune kids
To: cspackler
Watch out ! It is imminent. It could happen before the next millenia or two are over!
579
posted on
01/04/2004 12:01:11 PM PST
by
D Rider
To: bd476
A Kiss the Ground We Live in California Bump
The blowing of Yellowstone may be just the thing to set off the San Andreas and send CA sliding into the depths of the Pacific.
580
posted on
01/04/2004 12:04:26 PM PST
by
D Rider
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 621-630 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson