To: JediJones
Deciding that armies are equivalent to WMDs is a nice interpretation, but clearly not intended by the constitution since WMDs didn't exist then.An Army is a WMD by definition. If you don't understand that, no rational debate is possible.
59 posted on
01/01/2004 6:18:10 PM PST by
Woahhs
To: Woahhs
An army is not a WMD by any literal definition of the term. An army is a group of people who USE various weapons. Some have sad Saddam Hussein was a WMD. A nice concept too, but has no literal basis to it.
63 posted on
01/01/2004 6:25:01 PM PST by
JediJones
(An O'Reillyan Conservative)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson