Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones
Deciding that armies are equivalent to WMDs is a nice interpretation, but clearly not intended by the constitution since WMDs didn't exist then.

An Army is a WMD by definition. If you don't understand that, no rational debate is possible.

59 posted on 01/01/2004 6:18:10 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Woahhs
An army is not a WMD by any literal definition of the term. An army is a group of people who USE various weapons. Some have sad Saddam Hussein was a WMD. A nice concept too, but has no literal basis to it.
63 posted on 01/01/2004 6:25:01 PM PST by JediJones (An O'Reillyan Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson