To: alloysteel
How do the Chicago numbers compare to Baghdad? I understand a lot of people there are armed and ready to use weapons..Last I heard a few days ago Chicago runs 22 per 100,000 per year, while Baghdad runs 5 per 100,000 per year. Troops to Chicago? lol
52 posted on
01/02/2004 1:20:21 AM PST by
#3Fan
To: #3Fan
Last I heard a few days ago Chicago runs 22 per 100,000 per year, while Baghdad runs 5 per 100,000 per year. Troops to Chicago? lol The other laugh was that Iraq was crawling with all sorts of firepower, but they still had Saddam due to a feudal and/or a tribal culture. I figure their secret police had the populace terrified.
54 posted on
01/02/2004 2:06:13 AM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: #3Fan
Last I heard a few days ago Chicago runs 22 per 100,000 per year, while Baghdad runs 5 per 100,000 per year. Troops to Chicago? lol Don't laugh...troops is what would be needed to root out the scumbags in 2-3 distinct neighborhoods in Chicago.
62 posted on
01/02/2004 8:34:29 AM PST by
BureaucratusMaximus
(if we're not going to act like a constitutional republic...lets be the best empire we can be...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson