[NeoCaveman]

They are free to oppose his policy. But they are not free to hate him.

Oh let them hate, it's amusing.

He legally became President of the United States and we have to accept this sovereign decision of the American people like we want our elections to be respected by others. That´s what I do and want others to do. It´s not my or Europes medias business to tell the American people who to vote for!

Thanks for the reasonableness (if that is a word) lol.

I know the majority in many western European countries liked Clinton after all he benefited the Eurozone by

1. His strong dollar policy, which benefited European expoters at the expense of American companies.
2. Committed our troops to Kosovo, at the urging of the Euros, desite it antagonizing the Russians and benefitting jihadis like the KLA.
3. And he's a lefty, although probably rightwing by Euro standards.

Like I said last time, those days are over. I can understand and yet care not at all about the bitterness.

[Michael81Dus]

I think the war against Serbia was a necessity - and indeed it was a precedent in ignoring the UN Charter - justified by our moral standards we even want to see acknowledged in the justification for the Iraq war, now that no WMD have been found yet. The left-right-scheme doesn´t really fit in the European-American-comparison, I assume. It doesn´t fit in the inner-European comparisons either. Each society has its own political landscape. American foreign policy has always been following ideals, even under Clinton. This is a stable factor in US foreign policy.