Skip to comments.
Ford GT supercar priced at 139,995 US dollars
AFP ^
| Wed, Dec 31, 2003
Posted on 12/31/2003 10:49:16 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: truthandjustice1
I nearly bought a red Vette off the showroom floor a couple years ago. But I eneded up with this Toyota Highlander because I simply need room to carry my stringbass. Besides, the Vette is not ideal at 20 below and roads of ice for 8 months of the year. Maybe a roof rack . . .
41
posted on
12/31/2003 12:48:24 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Muleteam1
When was that, the 1980s?
Seriously, there is good and bad in pretty much every automaker's line. The only real clunker Ford has peddled in the recent past was the Focus, in its first year or two.
I have a 2000 F-150. I just passed 100,000 miles. The only problem I have ever had with it was a stuck valve, which was fixed under warranty, with no hassle.
It's probably time I had the spark plugs changed, I reckon. :-)
42
posted on
12/31/2003 12:51:11 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: RightWhale
I think that you could get those 50 series tires studded and use it year round. It's got good power, maybe hook a plow on as well. Rear engine, won't need weight in the back.
43
posted on
12/31/2003 12:53:29 PM PST
by
brooklin
To: presidio9
BTW, for those of us who don't have a spare $140K burning a hole in our pockets, keep in mind that the all-new Mustang is coming out next year, and it looks really nice.
44
posted on
12/31/2003 12:54:50 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: brooklin
There are slow bass players, there are fast bass players, and there would be RightWhale with his stringbass on the roof-rack. Now that would be a fast bass player.
45
posted on
12/31/2003 12:57:35 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: presidio9
But, it still has one over riding problem. It is a Ford.
Friends don't let friends drive fords.
46
posted on
12/31/2003 12:59:21 PM PST
by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: presidio9
Have you seen the Aston Martin AMV8 Vantage schedule to go into production in 2004/2005 ? (A baby Aston Martin.) GORGEOUS !!!!!!!
It's around $100K. Pocket change for us Freepers !! LOL
I do love the Ford GT !!! Ford built it with some help from Carroll Shelby, Roush, Saleen. Dan Gurney helped also. Ford brought in some heavyweights for the help. Seems to have been a good move.
Check out the current issue of Car and Driver. Camparisons between a Ferrari, Porsche, and the Ford GT. Very interesting !!
To: Charles Martel; presidio9
In fairness to the Ferrari lovers (aren't we all), I understand that the GT design was a Ford/Ferrari JV. Supposedly Ford was in discussions to buy Ferrari but the deal fell apart because Ferrari was worried about being swallowed up and ruined by Ford.
The GT does have Ferrari-esque lines.
To: presidio9
Yawn. I'd take a Porsche 930 Turbo any day over just about any car. 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. Beat that.
To: B Knotts
BTW, for those of us who don't have a spare $140K burning a hole in our pockets, keep in mind that the all-new Mustang is coming out next year, and it looks really nice.
I actually like the coupe better than the ragtop.
50
posted on
12/31/2003 1:05:53 PM PST
by
presidio9
(Mr. Dean is God's reward to Mr. Bush for doing the right thing in the war on terror -Dick Morris)
To: presidio9
Man, it's not fair that we can't all own one of these. Maybe the evil Republicans can get me one of these if I don't say anything bad about Haliburton. (/liberal hat off).
51
posted on
12/31/2003 1:19:46 PM PST
by
Joe_October
(Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
To: B Knotts
I may give away my age here but the first Ford I owned was a sky blue 1956 Ford Fairlane (Thunderbird 312 CI V8). It was ten years old when I bought it for $300. My next Ford was a 1983 Ford Ranger that overheated, started an engine fire, then caught me on fire when I tried to put it out (2nd & 3rd degree burns). After that I went to an '89 Totyota 4x4 then a '97 Toyota Tacoma and was never disappointed until I retired and needed a tow truck for the antique tractors I now rebuild. For this I use a very disposable '92 Ford F250 4x4 (140,000 mi.) but I always carry a large fire extinquisher.
Actually, Ford trucks are probably no worse than any other American truck. I've also owned a GMC, several Chevy trucks. Here in the southwest, used Ford trucks are much less expensive than the same year model Chevys.
Muleteam1
To: Zathras
what kinda car ? I'm 48 and still smile
ultimately,I've done 160 in a car and 124 on a motorcycle
To: B Knotts
can you direct me to a pic of the 05 'stang ?????
To: RightWhale
Yeah, they should have made it 139,999.95. That way everyone would think they were getting a bargain.
55
posted on
12/31/2003 1:51:18 PM PST
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: Lando Lincoln
Whew, after tabulating our Christmas bills, I told Missus Lincoln that the most we can spend on a new family vehicle is $140,000! Boy, we really cut it close!I sure hope you added taxes or you are going to have to put some more time in.
56
posted on
12/31/2003 1:57:53 PM PST
by
raybbr
To: presidio9
Someday the braintrust at Ford will wake up and realize that a visible copy of the
1967 Mustang fastback would make the sales number of the "New Beetle" appear pathetic.
57
posted on
12/31/2003 1:59:38 PM PST
by
VOA
To: cars for sale
See post #50. A couple pictures are posted there.
58
posted on
12/31/2003 2:12:04 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: VOA
Someday the braintrust at Ford will wake up and realize that a visible copy of the 1967 Mustang fastback would make the sales number of the "New Beetle" appear pathetic. See post #50. That's pretty close to what they are, in fact, doing. Also, keep in mind that those are pictures of the concept car shown a couple years back. The production model is supposed to be more retro than the concept.
59
posted on
12/31/2003 2:15:22 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: Sir Gawain
0-60 in 3.5 seconds. You mean the 911 Turbo? Porsche only claims 4.2 for that one.
They have the GT2 (Twin Turbo), which is 4.0.
This Ford beats both; its estimated 0-60 is 3.7 sec.
60
posted on
12/31/2003 2:22:44 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson