Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leadpenny
Actually, little children should be allowed to see any kind of pornography available on the internet, or in print. After all, it's a free country.

I mean, where would we be as a nation or people if pornography was in any way restricted? The horror of even contemplating the slightest restriction in even the most hard core sexually explicit, violent, degraded or perverted pornography! I mean, that's what the founders of this country had in mind when they wanted freedom of speech. The freedom of explicit, vile pornography for every little boy and girl!

Those leftist librarians are so right. Pornography - good. Ann Coulter's books - bad.
9 posted on 12/31/2003 2:21:48 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
I mean, where would we be as a nation or people if pornography was in any way restricted?

Why stop there. Why not have private rooms for pedophiles to have sex with children. As long as it is consenual what is the problem? I have no clue where libertarians draw the line and neither do libertarians.

12 posted on 12/31/2003 2:27:10 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Who's going to determine what "porno" is, a Library Filter Committee?
14 posted on 12/31/2003 2:28:56 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Cute. You forgot a sarcasm tag for those too stupid to figure it out.
43 posted on 12/31/2003 3:41:10 AM PST by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson