Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: milan
RE: Monica testimony in hard copy. Of srourse it was. But I was at the library when it became available and accessed it from there. WHat's wrong with that? The net is nothing if not conveient.

What I am wondering about is why on the website the article is posted is the word "pornography" written "p-rn-graphy". I did a cut n paste. But in this thread, including the original post, it's written "pornography". What's up with that? Is there something ....wrong...about the letter'O" when placed next to "p", "r", "n" or "g?"

prisoner6

61 posted on 12/31/2003 4:13:32 AM PST by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the left fall out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: prisoner6
I have no idea about why pornography was written the way it was. I personally don't think there is anything wqrong with the word. I also don't think that if someone wants to look at porn it is wrong. To each his own, in his home, as long as it does not harm others. I can't tell people how to live, but I can influence public settings and what is acceptable in public settings. I won't always get my way and that is fine, but public access to material that is meant for private consumption is rediculous to me.
62 posted on 12/31/2003 4:17:26 AM PST by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson