[milan]

If you want access to porn, you do it in your house. That is a right to privacy. If you want it in a public library, too damn bad. There are certain things which are acceptable in public and then there are certain things which are acceptable in private. Do you want to sleep with your girlfriend/wife in public? Do you somehow think you have a RIGHT to do that? This is not book burning. It is common sense, of which you are apparently lacking.

[NMFXSTC]

"There are certain things which are acceptable in public and then there are certain things which are acceptable in private."

RIGHT! But damned if I want sme non-elected, non-judicial "band of citizens" telling anyone what is acceptable...see MY stance?

[leadpenny]

We're almost back to square one. Who's gonna define porn?

And, who's gonna define "common sense?"

[brooklin]

I'm sorry, you can't legislate common sense. Our government has been trying to do that from day one. Adult supervision is what is needed here, not censorship by committee.

[Ruth A.]

Thank you for your response. I do not want to pay taxes for others--adults or child--to have acress to porn. There is no "right" to view porn. If, however, in a private place someone chooses to view porn and not bother anyone else nor claim anyone else's money to help then, then go ahead.

[ought-six]

"This is not book burning. It is common sense, of which you are apparently lacking."

Ah, the "common sense" angle, I see. Kind of like all the "common sense" gun laws, and the "common sense" EPA laws, and all the other "common sense" restrictions on our freedoms.