Replies

If you consider the books in this list you linked to, ALA | Quick Picks for Reluctant Young Adult Readers, to be pornographic then I guess The Simpsons is pornographic. There were three or four that Amazon.com didn't have so I could find nothing on then but the rest looked pretty tame for teenagers.

TigersEye: Our opinion, plan2succeed.org, that is, does not matter. The article was about how the book was viewed as pornographic by the New York City school system and was pulled from almost 400 libraries. We have not read the book ourselves, but we don't have to. We are not complaining about its contents. We are merely showing how the New York City school system found it to be porn, pulled it from almost 400 school children's libraries, and the ALA had the book on its "Top 10" list for "Reluctant Young Readers." We guess the ALA figures if you give porn to reluctant children, they will read it.

Why do librarians push porn on children? Why won't our town listen to its citizens instead of the ALA. This issue applies all over the USA, not just our town, and that is why we bring it to everyone's attention. If we help even one children from being sexualized by librarians, we will have saved at least that one child. But we want our message to get out so we can save more children, perhaps clearing all libraries of this type of porn. Please tell us where you disagree with this goal or why you believe it is unattainable. Besides, I sense you have not yet read the US v. ALA case which says it's perfectly legal to filter computers to protect children. Thanks for posting again. Please continue.