[Texas_Dawg]

Excuse me Sir, but you are wrong on that one. I am indeed a conservative who will vote for the Constitution Party, the America First Party, or the Libertarian Party or I may write in Tom Tancredo.

None of which are even remotely close to choices a true conservative would make. You're really not much of a conservative at all. I don't know your exact beliefs, but it's very obvious you are no kind of conservative in any manner. I'd imagine you're probably just another one of the national socialist populist union and "middle class" supporting types that lurk around here. Don't kid yourself. You're not a conservative. Conservatives only have one choice in 2004 and the overwhelming majority of them will make that choice happily.

[GunsareOK]

I've done a lot more with the DC Chapter than "lurk around." My record with them speaks for itself and I am not part of the "national socialist populist union" anything. If you wish to drink the Bushite Koolaid, be my guest.

[Who is John Galt?]

Conservatives only have one choice in 2004 and the overwhelming majority of them will make that choice happily.

Really? The first President Bush assumed that gun owners had 'no where else to go,' after he signed the ban on importation of so-called 'assault weapons.' Guess his assumption wasn't quite correct, and your's may not be, either - especially if the current President Bush renews the '94 Clinton/Feinstein 'assault weapons' ban...

;>)

[showme_the_Glory]

Conservatives only have one choice in 2004 and the overwhelming majority of them will make that choice happily.


Yep!!!! Happy to vote Bush in 04.

[Xenalyte]

Jeez, who died and made you the Namer of All True Conservatives?

[Godebert]

From what I can tell....he IS a Conservative, and you're just a bleating ewe.

[Godebert]

Your homepage looks very similiar to Chancellor Palpatine's. He also liked to attack true Conservatives, labeling anyone that didn't agree with his socialist neo-con agenda as an evil "paleo-Con". If you noticed.....Jim Robinson gave that boot to that liberal turd.

[DManA]

You must have an odd definition of the word "choice".

Conservatives only have one choice in 2004

Are you trying to say that conservatives have no choice? That's not exactly a conservative position to take.

[Sabertooth]

I'd imagine you're probably just another one of the national socialist populist union and "middle class" supporting types that lurk around here. Don't kid yourself. You're not a conservative. Conservatives only have one choice in 2004 and the overwhelming majority of them will make that choice happily.

Irony is sweet.

You call others national socialists with one breath,
and proudly advocate groupthink and goose-stepping in the next.

[the blood of tyrants]

"Conservatives only have one choice in 2004 and the overwhelming majority of them will make that choice happily."

And therein lies the problem. More and more, I hear from the right that it feels betrayed by Bush, and I think they are correct. I won't vote for 'Socialism Lite', no matter who is running against Bush. With "conservatives" like Bush, who needs Democrats?

Your definition of 'conservative' leaves a lot to be disired.