[donh]

: Much of present technology is based on either Classical fysics

Yes, well the technology which you are presently employing to communicate with me, is not. It is based on quantum fluctuation.

Modern fysics has degenerated to empty speculation on an ontological misnomer

Give me a break. Modern physics explained the two-slit phenomenon, the black-body phenomenon, resolved dozens of otherwise inexplicable notions about the universe, not least of which, is the question, "Where do the heavy elements get cooked up?"--gave us transistor technology, atom bombs, x-ray machines, and led us to the basic components of matter.

Of course the universe has a fixed time-space frame!

Of course it does not--please get yourself a rudimentary education in physics before spouting off in public about it, and save yourself further embarassment. IF the universe has a fixed time-space frame, than it cannot be the case that the speed of light has an absolute limit, irregardness of the observer's frame of reference. It cannot be the case that a clock accelerating ages more slowly than a stationary clock--and yet, that is the demonstrated case.

[G. Stolyarov II]

Mr. donh: "Give me a break. Modern physics explained the two-slit phenomenon, the black-body phenomenon, resolved dozens of otherwise inexplicable notions about the universe, not least of which, is the question, 'Where do the heavy elements get cooked up?'--gave us transistor technology, atom bombs, x-ray machines, and led us to the basic components of matter."

Mr. Stolyarov: You have not provided a link as to how these fenomena are explicable via modern fysics; how relativism and the macroscopic rejection of the obvious account for them or any modern technological feature. Your arguments are especial non sequiturs where practical accomplishments are concerned, as I can claim that these derive from partially true aspects of given modern theories that are consistent with the Indentity Principle, but these by no means prove the entire theories to be true.