Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: possible
Which leaves my second question, What, on your view, is the evidence?

I don't require a short answer. Just give me the first step or two of a long answer.

The evidence is human nature. One cannot steal without violating the requirement of one's own nature.

To understand that, however, requires one to understand what the nature of man is, and what the requirements of that nature are, and, then, how stealing is a violation of that nature. No creature can live successfully in violation of its own nature, but man is the only creature capable of choosing to do just that.

Hank

230 posted on 01/01/2004 1:11:06 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Kerchief
The evidence is human nature. One cannot steal without violating the requirement of one's own nature.

To understand that, however, requires one to understand what the nature of man is, and what the requirements of that nature are, and, then, how stealing is a violation of that nature. No creature can live successfully in violation of its own nature, but man is the only creature capable of choosing to do just that.

My questions were, "Is there, on your view, clear objective reason from observable evidence that theft is wrong? What, on your view, is the evidence?"

What aspects of human nature do you wish me to observe?

We might make more progress if you list the relevant observable evidence and spell out the reasoning from this observable evidence.

Thank you.

233 posted on 01/01/2004 2:17:59 PM PST by possible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson