Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monitor
nor his incorporating nuclear power into his energy plan, nor his judgment in appointing an attorney general inclined to sheathe immodest works of art.

Sigh...

9 posted on 12/29/2003 5:05:55 PM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KantianBurke
At least she seems to recognize that these are peripheral to the issues of being a leader, and that President Bush leads with integrity on this most crucial of issues. That makes up for a few petty jibes about Ashcroft's supposed prudishness. (She could have gone off on the Patriot Act, for example.)
12 posted on 12/29/2003 5:16:55 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Liberals: so open-minded that their brains fell out. That explains it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
Ashcraft is not a bad/incompetent AG because he covered the "immodest works of art." But he is a pretty assine prude. Hell, if he didn't want marble boobs sharing the stage with him during press conferences, he should have moved the location, and not paid God-knows-what for those fancy draperies.

That's about the only criticism of him that I am in perfect agreement with the liberals on.

20 posted on 12/29/2003 6:17:14 PM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
[sheathe immodest works of art.]

"immodest" What a kind word. How about blasphemous, or evil, or in your face insult, outrageous. Godspeed, The Dilg
38 posted on 12/30/2003 5:19:51 AM PST by thedilg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson