To: Monitor
nor his incorporating nuclear power into his energy plan, nor his judgment in appointing an attorney general inclined to sheathe immodest works of art. Sigh...
9 posted on
12/29/2003 5:05:55 PM PST by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: KantianBurke
At least she seems to recognize that these are peripheral to the issues of being a leader, and that President Bush leads with integrity on this most crucial of issues. That makes up for a few petty jibes about Ashcroft's supposed prudishness. (She could have gone off on the Patriot Act, for example.)
12 posted on
12/29/2003 5:16:55 PM PST by
alwaysconservative
(Liberals: so open-minded that their brains fell out. That explains it.)
To: KantianBurke
Ashcraft is not a bad/incompetent AG because he covered the "immodest works of art." But he is a pretty assine prude. Hell, if he didn't want marble boobs sharing the stage with him during press conferences, he should have moved the location, and not paid God-knows-what for those fancy draperies.
That's about the only criticism of him that I am in perfect agreement with the liberals on.
To: KantianBurke
[sheathe immodest works of art.]
"immodest" What a kind word. How about blasphemous, or evil, or in your face insult, outrageous. Godspeed, The Dilg
38 posted on
12/30/2003 5:19:51 AM PST by
thedilg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson