[NittanyLion]

No need. I have excellent comprehension skills, and I see he was not mocked *for* carrying a gun. It was pointed out to him that that alone and in and of itself is not sufficient defense for the country. A very valid point that so far has gone completely unaddresed while the inaccurate portrayal you cite was ballyhooed by the whiner.

Hmm...let's review the exchange.

Mulder: I don't, which is why I'm armed most of the time.

cajungirl: Why am I not surprised you are armed all the time? I am not being fractious, I am not saying anything to inflame anyone, just asking.

Mulder: I don't know. Maybe you believe that us peasants are incapable of defending ourselves, and only the gov't can do so?

cajungirl: Hon, do tell how your firearm would have helped anyone in that building on 911. And how is it going to stop an anthrax attack. You are delusional if you think that your defense can be what you need in this kind of war. Why, our fully armed young men are kgetting blown up as we speak. What have you done for the Republic other than try to deconstruct it?

Your "excellent" comprehension skille have failed you. Better have another look.

[cyncooper]

On the contrary, the review illustrates I understood perfectly. He was not mocked for carrying a gun.

As to your next post, again, you interpret my comment about "scenarios" as anti-gun when it was not.