To: MorningCoffee
The deep thinkers at Indymedia have come to the conclusion that the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy paints a "racist stereotypical tapestry" that does a disservice to young viewers everywhere. I think this critique has existed before the movies, or maybe it was the background role of women. the movies did make the effort to add more prominent female roles than the books.
2 posted on
12/29/2003 10:20:38 AM PST by
glannon
To: glannon
I think this critique has existed before the movies Yes, the mullahs of the left have characterized the books as racist/sexist/homophobic/insert-other-insensitivities-here for many years. The sane world ignores them.
To: glannon
Can you imagine how people of skin color, of Persian, Arab and East Asian ethnic background feel when they come out of these films where all the heroes are white and all the 'evil doers' are of dark skin," Hart writes. The Ents had brown skin er ah bark. They also were green, so I guess this viewpoint is represented.
But the movie must be really degrading to the giant firery eyes in our society.
To: glannon
But.. but... The Lord of the Rings is a worldwide hit series!!!
25 posted on
12/29/2003 10:53:12 AM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: glannon
maybe it was the background role of women. the movies did make the effort to add more prominent female roles than the books.
That's the only objection I have to the movies - in that regard, they're not staying true to the books. Let's face it . . . Tolkien didn't write meaty roles for women. I've come to terms with it. (Besides, Eowyn could kick Arwen all over Rohan and then some.)
39 posted on
12/29/2003 11:19:34 AM PST by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson