Replies

Yes, it is a crime in FL:

****

Title XLVI
CRIMES Chapter 836
DEFAMATION; LIBEL; THREATENING LETTERS AND SIMILAR OFFENSES View Entire Chapter

836.05 Threats; extortion.--Whoever, either verbally or by a written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace, or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will, shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

History.--s. 42, sub-ch. 3, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2420; GS 3261; RGS 5092; CGL 7194; s. 1, ch. 57-254; s. 991, ch. 71-136; s. 1307, ch. 97-102.

The facts do support the contention of the Clines. Remember she has the CIGAR BOX OF DOOOOOOOOOOOM. The Clines have to explain the money they received from Rush, Rush needs to explain the money the Clines received from him. It may be a credibility issue. If the Cliens received the money for pills, then they can conceal more serious activity. If they received the money for extortion the jeopardize their immunity deal.

Roy Black could not make the assertion of Blackmail without the actual information to support it. The prosecutor would be able to suppress wild accusations. From the smoking gun: "The CLINES made a taped statement, provided answer machine tape recordings and electronic mail in support of their informaiton. The ClINES also provided inormation on another drug dealer from whom they obtained mos ther the drugs that they sold to LIMBAUGH. The information regarding the additional drug dealer was fully investigated, corroborated and resulted in the undercover purchase of large quantitites of the described narcotics." It seems that the Prosecutor is using an old technique. You take an informant with duboious character. A establish them with another bust. Just from this tiny snip, if the evidence on Rush paned out they had enough. Why did they streach this out? The answer is because they trying to treat Rush as a dealer. They are DESPERATE to keep Rush, deny Rush the ordinary opportunty for the diverstion program of drug court.

"Roy Black could not make the assertion of Blackmail without the actual information to support it."
Sure he could... the judge let him say anything he wanted for the record...

"The prosecutor would be able to suppress wild accusations."
... and why would they do that... If the Clines are guilty , they go to jail also.

"They are DESPERATE to keep Rush, deny Rush the ordinary opportunty for the diverstion program of drug court."

... Excuse me ??? I thought Rush wasn't guilty of anything ?

... and where are these complaints filed by Rush against the Clines extortion ?

... and one thing noone seems to want to address -

Since Rush was scared of the Clines going to the Press with the story of his LEGAL drug use and paid them off, just WHY did the Clines ...

Make up this story about selling Rush pills...
Create the email, taped and written evidence..
GO TO the cops and rat on their suppliers !!!...
Wait 10 months ..

then sell a story to the Enquirer, when they could have sold them the LEGAL use story in the first place ???

The Clines may very well have been extorting money out of Rush, but it wasn't for his LEGAL use of drugs.