Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chi-townChief
In the story Denthor was reputed to be wise, and did assemble all the wisdom of the ages in his library / archives, which Gandalf often consulted. But the movie couldn't bring all subtle character nuances out - in the end it just portrayed him the way he essentially was, a coward who would have sacrificed his surviving son, and who believed victory was impossible and that all greatness was pastward. Bad steward. Very French.

I was less disappointed by the failure to draw out his character than to the total omission of Tom Bombadil and his good lady, Goldberry. They could've made a 4-hour movie of the escape from the Shire to Bree.

24 posted on 12/28/2003 6:54:21 PM PST by kcar (A gov't big enough to give you everything, doesn't really care about YOU anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: kcar
It's funny, the different things we all focus on - I'm not so much bothered by the omission of Tom Bombadil or Saruman's anti-climactic return as "Sharkey" as I am by the smaller changes such as the crossing of the Ford of Brunien, changes in Eowyn's, Faramir's, and Denethor's characters, the de-emphasis of the palantirs, Frodo's truncated claim of the Ring at Sammath Naur, etc.
30 posted on 12/28/2003 7:15:48 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson