Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Professer
Here it is:

Jamie Oliver has received a roasting from TV watchdogs after an outburst on his Channel 4 show. Oliver landed himself in hot water for an episode of Jamie's Kitchen, in which he worked to turn 15 jobless youngsters into top-class chefs.

During one encounter, an exasperated Oliver blurted out "Jesus f Christ" - and five viewers complained about his language.

Today the Independent Television Commission ruled that the program had breached TV guidelines. "The ITC took the view that this particular expression is deeply offensive to Christians and requires a high degree of justification, which it did not feel was present on this occasion," their report stated.

"The ITC also noted that the program began immediately after the watershed." Channel 4 said it had been imperative to show a "frank and candid portrait of Jamie Oliver" and to let viewers see "the reality and pressures of the challenge facing him".

A warning had been given at the start of the program, a spokesman added. source

21 posted on 12/28/2003 5:49:28 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: mountaineer
I wouldn't call this making fun of Christians. There's much worse than a quick phrase like that - it's when the premise of a whole show is religiously offensive. Note that the US version of Jamie's Kitchen was "bleeped," so we didn't hear the comment here in the states. There was a bunch of foul language in the series, and it all got cut. (Chefs working in a kitchen under time pressure and heat...yeah, some f-bombs are gonna drop).
27 posted on 12/28/2003 5:55:09 PM PST by July 4th (George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: mountaineer
"The ITC also noted that the program began immediately after the watershed." Channel 4 said it had been imperative to show a "frank and candid portrait of Jamie Oliver" and to let viewers see "the reality and pressures of the challenge facing him".

So if he was a child rapist they'd show that too? I'm not accusing him of a "Michael Jackson", but simply pointing out the absurdity of the Channel 4 execs.

63 posted on 12/29/2003 2:33:16 AM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson