To: JoeSchem
We have a Democrat in office, boys and girls. Spending is higher than under Clinton and so are deficits. We have prescription drugs about to become the biggest entitlement in the history of this country. We are giving amnesty to illegal immigrants. Clinton's CIA Director, the man responsible for the intelligence failure for 911, still holds his job. RU-486 is legal and we're expected to vote for pro-abortion federal court judges because they're Hispanic.
We have a Democrat in office, and it's time to run a Republican against him. Look at the electoral trends thanks to illegal immigration, and you'll realize that 2004 may be our last chance to elect a Republican who'll do something about it. Is your loyalty to Bush or to America?
My loyalty is to the USA. But else what can we do? Who is better? If unsatisfied conservatives vote for a third candidate and Dean ends up in office, are we better off?
I understand the points you make, but I still think a dem in office would be much worse for all you name and more.
102 posted on
12/28/2003 3:33:14 PM PST by
Agitate
(Got no flowers for your gun--no hippie chick!)
To: Agitate
If unsatisfied conservatives vote for a third candidate and Dean ends up in office, are we better off?
I hope that if a Democrat won, at least we'd have a strong GOP opposition...
CFR, the PATRIOT Act, medicare, a possible illegal amnesty and other things done in this administration have "disenfranchised" many Republicans (and independent conservatives as well), and if the amnesty goes through it's going to be that much harder to get a Republican in White House.
I don't know what the future will be with Dean, but with Bush it looks like America will become either another European country (socialist), or another Mexico.
119 posted on
12/28/2003 3:57:28 PM PST by
Tim Osman
(It's okay, I wasn't using those constitutional rights anyway.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson