To: At _War_With_Liberals
Bin Laden did not attack US soil after 93 (to 2001), because he had a deal with bill. USS Cole bombing? Kenyan Embassy bombing? 1993 WTC bombing?
I assume these were bombed on Uruguayan soil/property, eh?
100 posted on
12/28/2003 12:05:04 PM PST by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: ServesURight
No attacks on Us soil proper from 93-after Bill.
Explain to me why Bill refused to go after him, and even refused delivery of Bin L for 7 years?
And explain why there were no more terror attacks on US soil, the ultimate AQ target, for the remainder of Clinton's presidency, even though AQ cells were established? -they were largely downplayed, left alone and not hunted doggedly for 7 years... and why he was not concerned about any more attacks on US soil as evidenced by his inaction at home and by letting AQ run wild in Afgan?
I believe Clinton and Bin Laden had a deal.
111 posted on
12/28/2003 12:15:32 PM PST by
At _War_With_Liberals
(Illegal Immigration/Amnesty- The administrations' War on Middle Class Republicans)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson