Skip to comments.
Al-Qaeda turns to targeting luxury cruise liners in its jihad against the West.
New.Com.AU ^
| December 29, 2003
| staff writers
Posted on 12/28/2003 5:19:04 AM PST by yankeedame
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: LadyDoc
Well the zodiac suicide bomb that got the Cole is going to be damned hard to defend against. Ditto if Mad Mo's ragbag jihadists start trying to take out airliners with general aviation aircraft when they are on final, or trying to take off ( although that will take some piloting skill). Driving a zodiac, or a cigarette boat full of high explosives at a cruise ship at or near port is childs play in comparison.
We cannot WIN this on defense. There are an infinite number of ways to attack a complex society. Thats why we need to take the fight to THEM. Something the idiot Demon-Rats can't seem to grasp.
21
posted on
12/28/2003 6:52:29 AM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Steering a collision course isn't that hard, all you do is "null the line of sight rate", which is easier than it sounds.
Yup, steer till the object is at a constant spot on the windscreen, and bingo, collision course.
22
posted on
12/28/2003 6:54:55 AM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: yankeedame
Everything is a potential target. Next thread.
23
posted on
12/28/2003 7:00:40 AM PST
by
Consort
To: LadyDoc
Does anyone know the logistics of making a huge hole in a liner, if it would sink? Did you see TITANIC?
24
posted on
12/28/2003 7:02:58 AM PST
by
Alouette
(Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
To: yankeedame
I think the container ship scenario is the most likely. That could be very devastating.
It's time to have armed guards on cargo and cruise ships. An attack similar to the USS Cole attack could have been thwarted with an M-16. The inflatable 'attack' boat would have been sunk before it reached its target.
We need to use the Russian strategy, Make the terrorists pay with loss of what they treasure so expensive to them ( family, assests, ) that they think twice about attacking us.
Terrorists kidnapped a Russian Diplomat in Beruit yrs. ago. The Russians found out who was behind the deed, kidnapped a relative (brother I think), killed him, stuffed his genitals in his mouth and told the terrorists more was in store.
The terrorists released the diplomat and never kidnapped another Russian.
Unique and effective use of cojones.
25
posted on
12/28/2003 7:03:42 AM PST
by
Vinnie
To: yankeedame
Plans for the attack emerged after a US spy plane discovered scores of acoustic sea-mines had disappeared from a naval base in North Korea. North Korea.
So that's why are troops are backing up out of the DMZ. They don't wanna get hit by the fallout.
26
posted on
12/28/2003 7:05:27 AM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(Go ahead Al Queda. Make my day - punk.)
To: Kozak
Driving a zodiac, or a cigarette boat full of high explosives at a cruise ship at or near port is childs play in comparison. This has been a major worry of mine for a number of years. A Cigarette pleasure boat loaded with 400-500 pounds of an ammonium nitrate/motor fuel slurry explosive ramming today's large cruise ships would cause a huge casualty rate and might even split the cruise ship in two, which will definitely cause it to sink. :-(
To: carlo3b; MinuteGal
Be careful out there...
28
posted on
12/28/2003 7:21:36 AM PST
by
jellybean
(Proud retro-sexual :))
To: All
If anybody knows which thread listed a possible 20-30 cities that were most likely to be the subject of terrorist's attacks, would you please ping me?....I don't remember the title of the thread and I now need that information. Thanks in advance.
~Vor~
29
posted on
12/28/2003 7:21:48 AM PST
by
~Vor~
To: ALOHA RONNIE
bttt
30
posted on
12/28/2003 7:28:09 AM PST
by
metesky
(My investment program is still holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
To: Kozak
See #17 for a better tactic.
To: Vinnie
We need to use the Russian strategy, Make the terrorists pay with loss of what they treasure so expensive to them ( family, assests, ) that they think twice about attacking us. One possibility: Announce to the world a policy of grinding up the remains of anybody doing any sort of islamic terrorist thing along with the body of a pig and dropping same in a barrel from 40,000' straight into that big green monstrosity in Mecca with the loser's name written on it so that Allah would KNOW who had caused his holy place to be profaned.
To: LadyDoc
"Does anyone know the logistics of making a huge hole in a liner, if it would sink?"
If they have control of the ship, they can make it sink.
33
posted on
12/28/2003 7:43:15 AM PST
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: PLMerite
They wouldn't even need control of the ship.
34
posted on
12/28/2003 7:44:00 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: MoralSense; Lonesome in Massachussets
Ford is only 35, too young (legally) for the VP office. Huh? 35 is the age minimum for being president.
From Encarta:
III Qualifications and Candidacy
The qualifications for the vice presidency are the same as those for the presidency. The vice president must be a native-born American of at least 35 years of age who has resided in the United States for at least 14 years.
35
posted on
12/28/2003 7:48:07 AM PST
by
Malsua
To: hershey
Ford is too young.
To: Malsua
OK, I've mixed up two numbers, one, Ford's age, and the other, the required age. I suggested Ford as a candidate in one of my columns and got lots of mail pointing out he was too young. I don't remember his age, but I guess it must be less than 35.
To: Kozak
We cannot WIN this on defense. There are an infinite number of ways to attack a complex society. Thats why we need to take the fight to THEM. This needs repeating. The left wants the US to subjugate itself to the terrorists and some even on the right push for an isolationist policy. Neither will work against this type of enemy.
38
posted on
12/28/2003 9:06:11 AM PST
by
Tamzee
(Pennsylvanians for Bush! Join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PA4BushCheney/)
To: yankeedame
I agree with the tone of this article. I have thought since 9-11 that cruse ships are vulnerable to a terrorist attack. The owners of these lines have to realize this as well and I assume have taken appropriate measures. The cruse line companies can probably control who gets on the ship but out side attacks are tougher to control. An airplane or another ship crashing into the ship is very hard to counter against. We have a number of friends who used to take regular cruses but now are not doing so anymore.
To: LadyDoc
Or they could attack a ship with a small ship full of explosives like the USS Cole.
I suspect that will be a bit more challenging now.
We now have a Commander-In-Chief and a Secretary of Defense who probably have
instituted rules of engagement to "shoot the h-ll out of them" if a small boat
fails to heed warnings to stand-off.
"There's a new sheriff in town" since January 2001.
40
posted on
12/28/2003 10:08:00 AM PST
by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson