Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaeda turns to targeting luxury cruise liners in its jihad against the West.
New.Com.AU ^ | December 29, 2003 | staff writers

Posted on 12/28/2003 5:19:04 AM PST by yankeedame

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: LadyDoc
Well the zodiac suicide bomb that got the Cole is going to be damned hard to defend against. Ditto if Mad Mo's ragbag jihadists start trying to take out airliners with general aviation aircraft when they are on final, or trying to take off ( although that will take some piloting skill). Driving a zodiac, or a cigarette boat full of high explosives at a cruise ship at or near port is childs play in comparison.

We cannot WIN this on defense. There are an infinite number of ways to attack a complex society. Thats why we need to take the fight to THEM. Something the idiot Demon-Rats can't seem to grasp.
21 posted on 12/28/2003 6:52:29 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Steering a collision course isn't that hard, all you do is "null the line of sight rate", which is easier than it sounds.

Yup, steer till the object is at a constant spot on the windscreen, and bingo, collision course.
22 posted on 12/28/2003 6:54:55 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Everything is a potential target. Next thread.
23 posted on 12/28/2003 7:00:40 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
Does anyone know the logistics of making a huge hole in a liner, if it would sink?

Did you see TITANIC?

24 posted on 12/28/2003 7:02:58 AM PST by Alouette (Proud parent of an IDF recruit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I think the container ship scenario is the most likely. That could be very devastating.
It's time to have armed guards on cargo and cruise ships. An attack similar to the USS Cole attack could have been thwarted with an M-16. The inflatable 'attack' boat would have been sunk before it reached its target.

We need to use the Russian strategy, Make the terrorists pay with loss of what they treasure so expensive to them ( family, assests, ) that they think twice about attacking us.

Terrorists kidnapped a Russian Diplomat in Beruit yrs. ago. The Russians found out who was behind the deed, kidnapped a relative (brother I think), killed him, stuffed his genitals in his mouth and told the terrorists more was in store.
The terrorists released the diplomat and never kidnapped another Russian.

Unique and effective use of cojones.

25 posted on 12/28/2003 7:03:42 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Plans for the attack emerged after a US spy plane discovered scores of acoustic sea-mines had disappeared from a naval base in North Korea.

North Korea.
So that's why are troops are backing up out of the DMZ. They don't wanna get hit by the fallout.

26 posted on 12/28/2003 7:05:27 AM PST by PokeyJoe (Go ahead Al Queda. Make my day - punk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Driving a zodiac, or a cigarette boat full of high explosives at a cruise ship at or near port is childs play in comparison.

This has been a major worry of mine for a number of years. A Cigarette pleasure boat loaded with 400-500 pounds of an ammonium nitrate/motor fuel slurry explosive ramming today's large cruise ships would cause a huge casualty rate and might even split the cruise ship in two, which will definitely cause it to sink. :-(

27 posted on 12/28/2003 7:08:06 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b; MinuteGal
Be careful out there...
28 posted on 12/28/2003 7:21:36 AM PST by jellybean (Proud retro-sexual :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If anybody knows which thread listed a possible 20-30 cities that were most likely to be the subject of terrorist's attacks, would you please ping me?....I don't remember the title of the thread and I now need that information. Thanks in advance.
~Vor~
29 posted on 12/28/2003 7:21:48 AM PST by ~Vor~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
bttt
30 posted on 12/28/2003 7:28:09 AM PST by metesky (My investment program is still holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
See #17 for a better tactic.
31 posted on 12/28/2003 7:34:38 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
We need to use the Russian strategy, Make the terrorists pay with loss of what they treasure so expensive to them ( family, assests, ) that they think twice about attacking us.

One possibility: Announce to the world a policy of grinding up the remains of anybody doing any sort of islamic terrorist thing along with the body of a pig and dropping same in a barrel from 40,000' straight into that big green monstrosity in Mecca with the loser's name written on it so that Allah would KNOW who had caused his holy place to be profaned.

32 posted on 12/28/2003 7:39:38 AM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
"Does anyone know the logistics of making a huge hole in a liner, if it would sink?"

If they have control of the ship, they can make it sink.
33 posted on 12/28/2003 7:43:15 AM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
They wouldn't even need control of the ship.
34 posted on 12/28/2003 7:44:00 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense; Lonesome in Massachussets
Ford is only 35, too young (legally) for the VP office.

Huh? 35 is the age minimum for being president.

From Encarta:

III Qualifications and Candidacy

The qualifications for the vice presidency are the same as those for the presidency. The vice president must be a native-born American of at least 35 years of age who has resided in the United States for at least 14 years.

35 posted on 12/28/2003 7:48:07 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Ford is too young.
36 posted on 12/28/2003 7:58:21 AM PST by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Malsua
OK, I've mixed up two numbers, one, Ford's age, and the other, the required age. I suggested Ford as a candidate in one of my columns and got lots of mail pointing out he was too young. I don't remember his age, but I guess it must be less than 35.
37 posted on 12/28/2003 8:19:40 AM PST by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
We cannot WIN this on defense. There are an infinite number of ways to attack a complex society. Thats why we need to take the fight to THEM.

This needs repeating. The left wants the US to subjugate itself to the terrorists and some even on the right push for an isolationist policy. Neither will work against this type of enemy.

38 posted on 12/28/2003 9:06:11 AM PST by Tamzee (Pennsylvanians for Bush! Join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PA4BushCheney/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I agree with the tone of this article. I have thought since 9-11 that cruse ships are vulnerable to a terrorist attack. The owners of these lines have to realize this as well and I assume have taken appropriate measures. The cruse line companies can probably control who gets on the ship but out side attacks are tougher to control. An airplane or another ship crashing into the ship is very hard to counter against. We have a number of friends who used to take regular cruses but now are not doing so anymore.
39 posted on 12/28/2003 10:06:44 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
Or they could attack a ship with a small ship full of explosives like the USS Cole.

I suspect that will be a bit more challenging now.
We now have a Commander-In-Chief and a Secretary of Defense who probably have
instituted rules of engagement to "shoot the h-ll out of them" if a small boat
fails to heed warnings to stand-off.

"There's a new sheriff in town" since January 2001.
40 posted on 12/28/2003 10:08:00 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson