These irrelevant analogies do not make an economics professor an expert in foreign intelligence and covert actions of the US military. But it does help me to see why you think it does.
Anyhow, what particularly do you find that the writer wrote with which you disagree? What? Your sarcasm is never-ending, but you are not making your point at all. What particularly do you find incorrect in the article? Quit attacking the messenger, try attacking the message. You are sounding not unlike a weak-minded liberal with your rant against the writer's background.
I'm beginning to think you must have just had an unpleasant experience at your local chuckwagon or tearoom!