Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
How unexpected. Newsweak managed to write this piece in May 2000 without mentioning clinton once. Clark lied. The military lied. Heavens forbid that clinton lied about that dirty war.

They also forgot to ask why Milosevitch decided to surrender. Basically it was because wesley clark was bombing the hell out of the civilian population, had destroyed all their transportation, factories, dams, and power supplies, and was ready to see the people of Belgrade freeze in the dark in midwinter. I wonder who instructed clark to bomb the TV station in Belgrade, to take one instance? Or the Chinese embassy?

That was back when Newsweak was anxious that al gore should win the coming election, and could care less about Wesley Clark. Gore had a clinton problem, so Newsweak would not want to make clinton look any worse than he already did. Needless to say, they would not publish this article bashing clark today, when the clintons are backing him as their stalking horse.
4 posted on 12/27/2003 6:57:51 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
As I have been given to understand, the TV stations were bombed because they were sued as passive detection units to locate stealth bombers. The program for so doing was a Chinese deal, and the embassy was targeted as a retaliation for their having made the program available.

As for Clark, I'm not voting for him. But give him one thing - he was a military man unfortunate to be serving under the Klintoons. A more anti-military administration is hard to find in American history.
19 posted on 12/27/2003 8:50:30 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson