Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gaddafi 'Was Not Close To Building The Bomb'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12-28-2003 | Karl Schembri

Posted on 12/27/2003 4:16:18 PM PST by blam

Gaddafi 'was not close to building bomb'

By Karl Schembri in Tripoli
(Filed: 28/12/2003)

Libya was not close to building a nuclear weapon, said Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) yesterday.

Mr ElBaradei flew into Libya with a team of inspectors keen to test Colonel Gaddafi's promise to be "fully transparent" about his nuclear programme.

He confirmed that Libya had tried to enrich uranium as part of a weapons programme but did not appear close to producing a nuclear bomb. Col Gaddafi made a surprise announcement 10 days ago that his regime would abandon efforts to build WMD.

The deal was brokered by Britain and America in secret talks that sidelined the IAEA, the United Nations' atomic energy agency. Diplomats said yesterday that the agency had since had access to American and British intelligence material.

Mr ElBaradei did not rule out finding evidence that Libya had succeeded in enriching uranium but said that a "conversion facility" normally used for the purpose was "still in the boxes".

He said that a small enrichment facility had also been dismantled some time ago. The IAEA expects Libya to sign an agreement that would allow further extensive inspections at short notice.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bomb; building; close; gaddfi; libya; not; wmd
Another Bush failure. <>
1 posted on 12/27/2003 4:16:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
He confirmed that Libya had tried to enrich uranium as part of a weapons programme but did not appear close to producing a nuclear bomb.

So if I wasn't a diehard socialist liberal headline writer reporting for The Telegraph I might have written:

LIBYA WAS WORKING ON PRODUCING A NUKE

2 posted on 12/27/2003 4:28:41 PM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Don't you think it's good that the IAEA is only alarmist when it discusses the US?
3 posted on 12/27/2003 4:29:14 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (Nothing is as expensive as a free government service or subsidized benefit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
He confirmed that Libya had tried to enrich uranium as part of a weapons programme but did not appear close to producing a nuclear bomb. Col Gaddafi made a surprise announcement 10 days ago that his regime would abandon efforts to build WMD.

Sounds like a pretty good deal on Gaddafi's part. He traded an unsuccesful WMD program for oil contracts. Any CEO who made the same kind of deal would deserve a raise.

4 posted on 12/27/2003 4:42:25 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
ElBaradei is making a point that is meaningless.

Libya was part of a team.
Each team nation worked on a part of the bomb.
Individually, each could claim that they had no program to build a bomb.
However, together, the opposite is true.

This is a true lie.
5 posted on 12/27/2003 5:07:44 PM PST by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
not close?

what is this nuclear horseshoes?

.

6 posted on 12/27/2003 5:14:55 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Gaddafi 'Was Not Close To Building The Bomb'

Yeah. And a convicted sexual predator is in your neighborhood, but not close to your house.

You gonna let your kids play out front unattended?

7 posted on 12/27/2003 5:22:40 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Next thing you know the IAEA will say that there's no such thing as The Bomb - they can't seem to find evidence of it anywhere (with the exception of the US).
8 posted on 12/27/2003 5:32:24 PM PST by Moonmad27 (Nobody gets in to see the Wizard, not nobody, not nohow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Anyone have a link to the story about WMD's being intercepted in transit to Libya and this prompting an explicit expression to Gaddafi, by the U.S. and U.K., of the very limited options available to him?
9 posted on 12/27/2003 5:39:30 PM PST by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
I don't know what ole El is talking about, but below is the text of what the US found.

U.S. finds advanced nuke centrifuges in Libya http://216.26.163.62/2003/ss_libya_12_22.html SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM Monday, December 22, 2003 The United States was stunned by the discovery in Libya of advanced centrifuges for the enrichment of uranium for nuclear weapons.

Officials said a team of U.S. and British specialists found that Libya had constructed a centrifuge that was enriching uranium. Several other centrifuges were also found as part of what they said was a complete infrastructure for the production of nuclear weapons.

The team was also led to a Libyan medium-range missile program that included the Scud C. The missiles, with a range of 500 kilometers, were said to have been obtained from North Korea.

The discovery stunned Western officials and intelligence analysts who had earlier determined that Libya's technological infrastructure was insufficient for a nuclear weapons program. Officials did not say how much uranium was enriched by Libya or which country assisted Tripoli. But one official said Iraq was not a source of Libyan nuclear expertise.

"The Libyan effort sought to develop a nuclear fuel cycle in cooperation with one or more countries," an official said. "There are many ways to interpret the data we've acquired, but I would say that they were no more than two years away from developing a nuclear bomb."

Over the last three months, Tripoli granted a British-U.S. team access to Libyan WMD and missile programs as part of that country's efforts to end sanctions by London and Washington. Officials said the regime of Col. Moammar Khaddafy provided what they termed "significant information" on Libya's nuclear and chemical weapons programs.

For years, Libya denied any WMD program, particularly regarding nuclear weapons. But in a statement over the weekend, the Bush administration said Libya has also acknowledged the development of biological weapons program as well as medium-range ballistic missiles to serve as delivery systems for WMD.

Officials said Libya contacted Britain and the United States in March 2003 and asserted its willingness to discuss Tripoli's WMD programs. They said Khaddafy ordered the relay of Libyan documents on his nation's WMD and missile programs to London and Washington.

U.S. and British experts, including those from the CIA, gained access to Libyan facilities and found uranium enrichment activity at more than 10 sites, officials said. They said the team, which visited Libya in October and December, was also shown what was termed significant quantities of chemical agents.

The visit by the U.S.-British team clarified many elements of Libya's WMD program, officials said. A recent CIA report that covered the period from Jan. 1 to June 30, 2003 asserted that Libya continued to develop its nuclear infrastructure. The report noted nuclear cooperation talks between Libya and Russia regarding the Tajura nuclear research center and a potential nuclear power reactor deal.

"Such civil-sector work could have presented Libya with opportunities to pursue technologies also suitable for military purposes," the CIA report said. "In addition, Libya participated in various technical exchanges through which it could have tried to obtain dual-use equipment and technology that could have enhanced its overall technical capabilities in the nuclear area."

On Saturday, Libya pledged to dismantle all of its WMD programs and declare nuclear activities to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Libya also pledged to destroy ballistic missiles with a range of more than 300 kilometers and a payload of 500 kilograms.

Other Libyan pledges included complete adherence to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and its signing of the Additional Protocol. Tripoli was also said to have pledged to adhere to the Chemical Weapons Convention and destroy all chemical weapons stockpile.

U.S. officials said Libya would also allow immediate IAEA inspections and monitoring to verify Tripoli's pledges. They said this could pave the way for the removal of British and U.S. sanctions on the Tripoli regime.

"Should Libya pursue internal reform, America will be ready to help its people to build a more free and prosperous country," President George Bush said on Friday. "Because Libya has a troubled history with America and Britain, we will be vigilant in ensuring its government lives up to all its responsibilities."

10 posted on 12/27/2003 5:58:15 PM PST by Go Gordon (The older I get, the better I used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
Do you think if Ghaddafi was close to finishing a nuclear weapon that he would voluntarily surrender his WMD program to President Bush? This is the sort of thing that you have to stop early, or it will be more difficult to stop at a later time. Bush's willingness to take a hard line against Saddam has paid off here.
11 posted on 12/27/2003 6:51:46 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
How could ELBaradei, who just got there, have come to any conclusions about Libya's progress?? - tom

TRIPOLI, Libya Dec. 27 — The director of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency and a team of experts arrived in Libya on Saturday to follow up on Moammar Gadhafi's promise to dispose of his weapons of mass destruction. The Foreign Ministry said Mohamed ElBaradei, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, met with Libyan officials, but no further details were available.

12 posted on 12/27/2003 7:43:52 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson