[Ethan_Allen]

"Even a prisoner has a recognized right to refuse unwanted medical or health measures."

...USED to....

"Forced Drugging By Government"
http://www.supercivilization.com/forum/message/2147/


"American Conscience: The Saga of Dr. Charles Sell & The Strange Case of the U.S. Versus Doctor Sell"
http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/june2003/markr620-1.htm

More on google under 'drugging of doctor sell waco'

{The reverse situation is seen in the Terri Schiavo case, a prisoner of the judicial-medical racket in Florida, where she never said she wanted to be starved and dehydrated to death, yet the government insists it is the government's right and duty to protect her 'due process' 'rights' to have her husband order ho$pice killer$ finish off what began under suspicious circumstances 13 years ago. Nevermind the husband has a legally-binding conflict-of-interest, since he wants her dead so he can get on with life with his honey and their two kids, and whatever is left of the over $1-3(??) million dollars he received specifically for Terri's rehabilitation. If the government was seriously interested in protecting the LIFE of Americans, it would have the Attorney Generals of every state, and Attorney General Ashcroft spend that $400 million investigating the forced euthanasia of unwilling, helpless Americans to fulfill the long-standing wish-list of the Rockefellers and their ilk. They are just looking for more avenues to apprehend and prey-upon law-abiding Patriots. Just my opinion, of course.}

[mvpel]

The Eighth Circuit is apparently ruling in contradiction to the US Supreme Court, which established that "A competent person has a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause in refusing unwanted medical treatment," in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, [110 S.Ct. 2841, 497 U.S. 261, 111 L.Ed.2d 224, 58 USLW 4916, 1 NDLR P 38 (1990)]