To: Orangedog
And you are aware that many, if not most (I've forgotten the stats that are published each year) of those people who forgo automobile insurance generally do so for financial reasons and do not have medical insurance and CANNOT pay for the medical costs incurred in the auto accident.
Hospitals will not generally kick them out, and so pass the costs along to - guess who? All of us!
58 posted on
12/27/2003 4:26:31 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
Hospitals will not generally kick them out, and so pass the costs along to - guess who? All of us! So a bad business decision on the part of hospitals is a reason for the government to pass laws and hand out $400 of tax money to the states so they can write more tickets? Sorry, I disagree.
65 posted on
12/27/2003 4:30:29 PM PST by
Orangedog
(Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
To: Peach
The fundamental question is not "are seatbelt laws good?" but rather, "are seatbelt laws a federal matter?"
One may strongly assent the first and not to the second.
To: Peach
Hospitals will not generally kick them out, and so pass the costs along to - guess who? All of us!I would prefer a law that says 'If you get in to a wreck, and you didn't wear a seatbelt/ helmet, and you live, you are entitled to NO government help or compensation of any kind.
87 posted on
12/27/2003 4:51:04 PM PST by
ovrtaxt
(Want to see the US morph into France? Vote Dem. (For slo-mo viewing, vote Rep.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson