Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orangedog
Didn't see your other post distinguishing between seatbelts and seatbelt laws.

#1: Your assertion that seatbelts MAY save lives and reduce medical costs flies in the face of all available medical and forensic science in over 2 decades.

#2: Your assertion that seatbelt LAWS do not save lives or reduce medical costs - laws don't save lives per se, as you are aware. However, if we did not have a law against murder, are you saying there wouldn't be more murders? People like me probably would not have started belting up unless there were LAWS that required me to do so or pay a fine.
42 posted on 12/27/2003 4:15:13 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
I'm gracious enough to concede point #1. I always wear mine, but that should be my choice, not the reason for the government to get involved in my life.

But I will take issue with you on point #2. Comparing seatbelt laws and murder is a straw man argument. It is not a legitimate function of Constitutional government to fine people for not wearing a seat belt.
49 posted on 12/27/2003 4:20:56 PM PST by Orangedog (Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson