There was NO ,none,nada,zilch,bupkiss spending reductions, when Reagan got his tax cuts put through either and some of President's Bush's ARE permanent; the rest of them may become so, in his second term. Without his re-election, they'll ALL be rescinded, with MORE taxes heaped on top.
The president, not ANY president, can do away with legal abortions of every stripe. This was a start.
You wouldn't know reality, if it bit you on the nose and hung on. And as far as President Bush not having done much...you're in denial.
What Reagan did or didn't do is irrelevant. The fact that Bush's cuts weren't matched by spending cuts, and in fact were met with drastic spending increses - much of it totally unrelated to the War on Terror - means that both government and the debt will continue to balloon out of control.
some of President's Bush's ARE permanent...
So that's like, what, half of zilch?
...the rest of them may become so, in his second term.
Might-be's aren't the subject of our discussion.
The president, not ANY president, can do away with legal abortions of every stripe.
OK, so you've gone from saying that Bush has delivered 50% of what "they" (whom I interpreted to mean constitutionalists or people with similar viewpoints) wanted, to giving excuses for why in fact he hasn't done so. All too predictable.
You wouldn't know reality, if it bit you on the nose and hung on. And as far as President Bush not having done much...you're in denial.
Seems you have your work cut out for you if you actually intend to back up that statement.