Here's what's happening. You're probably spending time parsing my post and responding to individual statements. That's not what tonight is about. You asked me to put up my comments and I did. You said I supported the agenda and I explained to you before and again tonight how I don't. If you address these points and admit your error, I may come back other wise I won't. Yep. I tore your arguments apart. What you don't understand is that by denigrating the facts, by calling us names, playing all your games and never, once, providing any information to support what you say, you are supporting the homosexual agenda. That's what this is all about.
You are being inconsistent. You are saying you don't support the homosexual agenda in one post, and then attack and try to denigrate the facts and those who post them, tell us we're wrong and never provide any information to rebut anything we've said. You don't even talk about the health hazards of the homosexual lifestyle, nor the tainted blood, nor the blood issues in the military - you just ignore the major issues.
Breakem says he's not supporting the homosexual agenda. But he is attacking you, me and anyone else who is telling the truth about the homosexual agenda.
What does this remind me of? It reminds me of the French. They say they are not pro-terrorist - but what do they do? Verbally attack the US attempts to fight terrorists, personally attack President Bush, and screw up attempts to catch terrorists. So whose side are the French really on?