Replies

38 states already have defense of marriage laws, and the big polls are showing overwhelming support for the Federal Marriage Amendment.

Our founders put sodomizers to death, and they obviously didn't even imagine that sodomizers would try to legitimize something like marriage between themselves and fight legitimate parents for custody of their children. Our founders would be rallying around this Amendment as we are.

AEI - Publications (written before the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act decision of Dec 03, where even J.Kennedy was correct)

Beneath the Supreme Court's many astounding decisions in its 2002-2003 term, and the shifting judicial coalitions that produced those results, runs a unifying basso continuo: Constitutional law, in the sense of judicial decisions that are guided--at least in aspiration--by the text, structure, and logic of the written Constitution, is dead. It has been replaced, often as a matter of explicit doctrine, with subjective judicial impressions of popular sentiment or political utility. Federalist Outlook, The Term the Constitution Died, Michael S. Greve,Friday, July 25, 2003

There is nothing wrong with the U.S. Constitution and nearly everything wrong with the federal judicary. Congress has the cure. They can amputate by removing jurisdiction, or use the guillotine and impeach/remove.

I just checked out LPM1888's profile page and this is what he/she says about homosexuality, so this explains his/her support of their agenda:

"Homosexuals

Some people seem to fear homosexuals, particularly around children. There are several homosexuals in our extended family and they have never tried to entice or otherwise seduce my children. Certainly some homosexuals have been known to do so but so have straights. I suspect the percentage of pedophiles is the same in each group. Based on sheer numbers that means that there are more straights to be watched closely than gays or lesbians.

I am also firmly convinced that genetics is a major factor in sexual determination. One of my friends who is a lesbian has bodily features that are so obviously male that she alone constitutes a very strong proof of genetic disposition. Anyone she meets knows immediately that she is a lesbian and that she didn't have any choice, she's built like a Mack Truck. I also had a male cousin who was almost a full double cousin (ours fathers were brothers and our mothers are first cousins). On his side, the only genetic lineage we do not share included an uncle who was definitely homosexual and a concert musician. My double cousin was homosexual and he said he never had a desire for a female in his life, he also was an accomplished musician and had a brief career in ballet. I on the other hand am completely straight and tone deaf. Those two people have completely convinced me about the genetic aspects of homosexuality. I am proud to have both of them as family members. "

Note to LPM1888: Just because you FEEL something to be so, based on what your imperfect eyes have seen and then computed with your imperfect (limited) mind, does not make something TRUE. If you really want to know the truth about homosexuality, you need to study. If you don't want to study, that means you don't want to know the truth.

Saying that you "know" homosexuality to be genetic, and to "know" that homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals, is like saying that you "know" the sun to really be flat like a plate because that's how it looks to your eyes.