[HostileTerritory]

You didn't address what I wrote at all. I gave a reason why the attitudes of people in their 20s as an aggregate are different from those of people in their 50s, and why they are unlikely to be related to the aging process.

I really don't think that today's senior citizens were more positive about homosexuals forty years ago and changed their minds as they "aged." Homosexuals didn't exists in anyone's daily life.

[Ronly Bonly Jones]

I really don't think that today's senior citizens were more positive about homosexuals forty years ago and changed their minds as they "aged." Homosexuals didn't exists in anyone's daily life.>>

That's utter nonsense. Homosexuals have been around from the beginning of time. What didn't exist in anyone's daily life was the threat of social and even legal ostracism if you didn't accept homosexual evil as good; that's only been the case since, oh, I don't know, 1992 maybe. That's reversible and it SHOULD be reverse.