Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Al Qaeda vows back-breaking strike’
The Indian EXPRESS ^ | DECEMBER 26

Posted on 12/27/2003 12:27:02 PM PST by Mossad1967

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last
To: Mossad1967
"Osama bin Laden has vowed to launch a ‘‘back-breaking attack’’

Thanks for the advance warning, I'll try to do my part to break Al Qaeda's back, Osama!
21 posted on 12/27/2003 12:54:36 PM PST by SwinneySwitch ("When somone says he is going to kill you -- believe him", Gamla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
A reminder to the sand ******s: Payback is a b*tch often dealt back tenfold.
22 posted on 12/27/2003 1:00:22 PM PST by Beck_isright (This tag line edited by the 9th Circuit Court due to offensive political commentary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
BTTT
23 posted on 12/27/2003 1:03:57 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tag Lines Repaired While You Wait! Reasonable Prices! Fast Service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Blah, blah, blah.

Did I hear OBL cry wolf? Jeez....he does it every week. No one is listening any more.
24 posted on 12/27/2003 1:04:25 PM PST by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
That's what I think too! Why doesn't he just make a video holding up today's NY Times. I think the reason we haven't said we believe he is dead is because there is nothing to be gained. He becomes a martyr the instant we prove he is dead. This way, we just "keep looking for him". Hope he got his 77 virgins!
25 posted on 12/27/2003 1:05:47 PM PST by telone2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
I agree. A hit on the US = Mecca or Medina obliterated.
26 posted on 12/27/2003 1:10:19 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
As horrific as the 9-11 attacks were, what made them catastrophic was the burning fuel in the planes that caused the towers to collapse.

I question how a plane that leaves Paris and intentionally crashes in L.A. or Vegas will have much jet fuel left to create similar distruction. True, there will still be deaths and destruction - it just wouldn't be on the scale of the WTC incident.

Since American screening is probably now too stringent and the passengers now hip that they should fight back, I'd be targeting cross-country flights from Vancouver or Montreal or possibly the Caribbean if I were Al Qaeda (which, gladly, I'm not).
27 posted on 12/27/2003 1:11:00 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Want to improve your memory? Loan someone your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYDave
Days before 9/11 a key Northern Alliance leader was killed. He would have been a key ally when we went after UBL and crew.

Two attempts have recently been made on Pakistani Pres. Mushareff. If UBL is still in Pakistan, we need Mushareff's help to get him.

I see similar circumstances leading up to another big attack.

28 posted on 12/27/2003 1:20:31 PM PST by mr.muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mr.muggs
I agree. Scenario is similar.

They are mistaken, however, in the same way that they were mistaken regarding Halfgonistan.

29 posted on 12/27/2003 1:28:54 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Go ahead Al Queda. Make my day - punk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
They don't need a weapon if we provide it to them.

I hope point air defense is also elevated outside Denver.

The last "bomb threat" was a Denver based outbound flight. Do you know what else is outside of Denver? (@Rocky Mountain Flats).

Heck, you don't want fuel to burn if you hit that stuff.
30 posted on 12/27/2003 1:32:14 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Go ahead Al Queda. Make my day - punk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
There are two things to consider: possible targets and possible points of origination or entry. We can't possibly muster the resources to protect all potential targets so it means we need to be diligent to guard all possible points or entry.

Air defense is certainly one part of the equation but they can't be everywhere.

I do think that, if you want to guess where they will strike, look for 1) locations of national strategic or symbolic importance and/or 2) locations with a large Jewish population. So, by that thinking, I still say the most likely targets are New York, Washington, Hollywood and South Florida.
31 posted on 12/27/2003 1:41:31 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Want to improve your memory? Loan someone your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
This is the latest AL QUEDA image. Notice the burning stadium in the lower right hand corner. What do you think?

32 posted on 12/27/2003 1:42:34 PM PST by PokeyJoe (Go ahead Al Queda. Make my day - punk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Bunch of 'signifying' nonsense. ......which is what Islamists do when they're impotent.

Reminds me a a little dog that the only defense is a shrill bark. These guys see how desperate their cause is. The dems here see the same thing. Only here on our shores we have a president that won't/can't throw the knockout punch probably due to the elites. So don't count on conservative SC justices, don't render the Jessie Jacksons, NEA, ACLU impotent because there are always pubbies there to keep them propped up - that's the strangness of it all.

33 posted on 12/27/2003 1:49:15 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
Makes as much sense as turning Somalia into a giant golf course, which is how one might read the image at the top.
34 posted on 12/27/2003 1:49:23 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Want to improve your memory? Loan someone your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I don't think we would bomb Mecca or Medina for anything less than simultaneous nuclear attacks on ten or twelve cities. We just wouldn't do that. I do wonder, who in hell would we retalliate against if Osama pulled something off. Seriously, not just barking out threats, where would we retalliate???
35 posted on 12/27/2003 1:55:19 PM PST by cajungirl (I adore the Brits!! Tony Blair is my hero!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fighter@heart
1 Nuke + 1 Mecca @ peak visitation = Impact statement

I think we should definitely, on the quiet, explain to all the governments of the region, and tell them to get the message to the terrorists, that any more strikes on the US, and we will nuke Mecca. Some might say that this will mean war with 900 million Muslims. I think it might be a heavy psychological blow for them. If their moon god was real, would he really let us blow up their meteor? I don't think so.

SO....their choice is, go back to their pathetic existence, and watch modernity bring the stupidity of their raghead culture and religion to light, slowly extinguishing it from the planet, or have it extinguished for them by force if they try to impose it on the civilized world. If they are smart, they will choose the former, where they can continue to enjoy their heritage and hope for better days, rather than the latter, which will ensure a massive loss of life and the death of their culture.

36 posted on 12/27/2003 2:04:52 PM PST by Defiant (A metrosexual is a nancy-boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
'Al Qaeda vows back-breaking strike’

The back that is broken, however, may very well be that of al-Qaeda. Young men, with an excess of testosterone, tend to believe in their own invulnerability. Lured into situations beyond their ability to cope, they seem to self-destruct with alarming regularity.

When you fall into a meat grinder, you suddenly realize the wurst is yet to come.

37 posted on 12/27/2003 2:05:25 PM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Hey, Sammi:
I've got family that'll be coming down in February.
Can we blow this off til, say, mid-March or maybe April?
We'll let the French know that this schedule will never do...
Thanks,
Baltodog

P.S. There aren't 72 virgins anywhere.
38 posted on 12/27/2003 2:11:49 PM PST by baltodog (When you're hanging from a hook, you gotta' get a bigger boat, or something like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
First, there was going to be a death blow against America during the lunar eclipse. Then it was going to be during Ramadan. Then Christmas. Now they're waiting until Valentine's Day? Puh-leeze.

Defecate or get off the pot, Sammie. Your 72 virgins are bored and lonely (they're probably not even virgins at this point). Of course, after all those long, candlelit nights hiding in caves with Mullah Omar, you might not be too interested in females anyway.

39 posted on 12/27/2003 2:27:50 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mossad1967
Bring it on you little maggots! We've got plenty of graves, coffins and hospitals to stuff your sorry selves in.
40 posted on 12/27/2003 2:37:58 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson