Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
Now, PLEASE, address SPECIFICALLY why the violation of the cease-fire agreement wouldn't be a legal justification for war.

It was to the UN that those cease fire promises were made and it was the UN that was dealing with Saddam. The Security Council had the responsibility to use force to enforce those provisions. They wisely decided against that course of action.

180 posted on 12/30/2003 6:41:53 AM PST by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: Mike4Freedom
It was to the UN that those cease fire promises were made and it was the UN that was dealing with Saddam. The Security Council had the responsibility to use force to enforce those provisions. They wisely decided against that course of action.

No, the cease fire was negotiated by Schwarzkopf and signed by the leaders of the coatlition. It was up to the coalition to patrol the no-fly zones and it was they who were fired upon, negating the cease-fire.

You seem to have a real love for the UN, when they have constantly proven themselves to be worthless. Face it, as has been shown, Russia, France and Germany had too much to lose to allow war in Iraq to happen. They didn't give a rats ass about our security. You may want to surrender our sovreignity to the UN, but I don't.

184 posted on 12/30/2003 8:21:04 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson