Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fzob
Two things, at least, make this case anti-Constitutional:

1. "Structuring" - why should the governemnt know where my money goes, unless they have probable cause? This law is itself a probable cause manufacturer. Make everyone a suspect and probable cause is a joke.

2. "Doctor shopping?" My parents are old enough to remember when doctor/patient relationships were so sacred even obviously relevant criminal investigations had a difficult time piercing that barrier.

With HSAs in the medicare bill, YOU will start to pay for doctors with YOUR money, directly. Show me where in the Constitution the government is authorized to stick its nose in that?

66 posted on 12/26/2003 6:15:20 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
It does appear that some on this forum are far more concerned that Rush gets nailed rather than HOW he gets nailed.

Many are claiming his defenders would have a different spin if he were a liberal.

Psychologists call it "projecting", I believe.

The ones that are squealing about his defenders' alleged "hypocrisy" would most certainly go off the deep end if a liberal were to receive this kind of treatment from a prosecutor.

Fortunately for the libs, history has shown it rarely happens to one of their own.

164 posted on 12/26/2003 7:14:07 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson