To: Texas_Dawg
The war has been prosecuted brilliantly, with the exception of Bush's shabby treatment of Israel. The tax cuts were a pittance, a penny in the hand of a peasant boy from the hand of Rockefeller, given before a crowd to prove his generosity.
With those exceptions, what's the difference? PLEASE tell us.
If Jefferson and Madison were alive today, they would be publicly executing incumbent politicians in the streets of DC.
70 posted on
12/26/2003 5:27:07 PM PST by
ovrtaxt
( http://www.fairtax.org -- Posted for the benefit of the International Lurkers of the World.)
To: ovrtaxt
With those exceptions, what's the difference? PLEASE tell us. The difference is that Al Gore would not have even responded to 9/11. He would have raised taxes instead of lowering them which would have drastically reduced this year's stock market rally. His Medicare bill would have been far larger and would not have included the key window-opening MSAs provision which will be like the initial introduction of 401ks in the future. Gore would not have cut out payments to foreign abortion clinics or ended partial-birth abortion. Gore would have put in far left-wing judges whereas Bush has put in over 100 conservative ones so far with more to come. I could list 1,000 things, but if you don't understand the difference in GWB and Al Gore (or the next Democratic nominee), then you are a complete idiot.
102 posted on
12/28/2003 8:06:00 PM PST by
Texas_Dawg
(Waging war against the American "worker".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson