Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema
Great post, there is little to add.

Mark A Sity
http://www.logic101.net/
2 posted on 12/26/2003 4:32:53 AM PST by logic101.net (Support OUR troops, not Saddam's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logic101.net
I think that one could and should add that McCain Feingold was passed by a Republican Congress, signed into law by a Republican president, and upheld by several Supreme Court "justices", some of whom were appointed by Republicans.

There is only one party in this country. We have a permanent government that just took another step toward formalizing their semi-heriditary rule. Let's talk about that, shall we?

All here who strove with might and main to elect Republicans are directly to blame for this outrage on the Constitution. You can't, my friends, vote for a party that routinely stabs you, their base supporters, in the back time after time after time and then profess surprise at the outcome.

A bedrock principle of our Common Law is that a man is presumed to intend the foreseeable consequences of his actions. You who gave money to the Republicans and voted for the Republicans and encouraged others to do the same in justice and in law intended exactly this murder of the First Amendment.

Admit it. You want Big Brother. Quit lying to yourselves, folks. You want the tyranny that is coming, because you fear the freedom and responsibilities of the American Revolution. If that weren't so, then why did your party just saddle future generations with the biggest socialist welfare-state program since LBJ?

Your words are one thing, but your actions are quite the opposite thing. Your actions betray your true motives of fear of having to deal with the freedom the Constitution exacts from us.

By their fruits you shall know them. And you who supported the GOP certainly knew how rotten the tree is. You can't no claim that you didn't know.

Nobody can accept the leadership of a Party that gave us the egregiously mis-named "Patriot Act" or that of self-admitted traitors and Trotskyites like David Horowitz and the rest of the neo-con infestation and then claim ownership of the American Tradition as laid down by the Founders.

You Republicans want what's coming, but you lack the moral fibre to admit it.

You want to be lead, and cared for, and loved by the dark face behind the mustache on the propaganda posters that will line the streets of our children's America.

Just admit it to yourselves and to others. You're statists and socialists in league with the New Deal. Get honest about it.

At least we'll be clear about who the enemy is. It's the lying, cryptic nature of Republican socialism and socialist Republicans that I can't stand.

4 posted on 12/26/2003 5:05:59 AM PST by Heartbreak of Psoriasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: logic101.net
"The First Amendment died earlier this month.

And if the First Amendment is dead, can we honestly claim to be a democratic republic any more?"

Borders? We ain't got no STEENKING BORDERS!

Democracy? We ain't got no STEENKING DEMOCRACY!

(Democracy has been replaced with "another" option.)

"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"

Answer:

U.S. Supreme Court, 2003 - The Oligarchy*

(All Your Sovereignty Are Belong To Us!)

Justices of the Supreme Court

Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state


25 posted on 12/26/2003 6:04:44 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: logic101.net
The saddest part of this tragedy is that so few seem to understand what just happened to us.
30 posted on 12/26/2003 6:24:57 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson