Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Libya saw the light
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 12/26/03 | Daniel Schorr

Posted on 12/26/2003 12:34:49 AM PST by mansion

WASHINGTON – The idea that Libya's Col. Muammar Qaddafi last March saw American forces invading Iraq and decided "the jig was up" for Libya is attractive in its simplicity. But the events that led to the surprise declaration on Dec. 19 that Libya would scrap its own weapons programs are more complicated and stretch out over a longer period.

Libya and the United States have been in an unannounced state of conflict since 1981, when American jets shot down two Libyan planes over disputed waters. Qaddafi retaliated with terrorist attacks in Rome and Vienna. The US embargoed Libyan commerce. In 1986, President Reagan ordered the bombing of Qaddafi's compound, killing 37 persons, in reprisal for the bombing of a West Berlin cafe in which two American GIs were killed. In 1988, the back-and-forth violence reached its climax with the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, killing 270 on board.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world began to look different. Qaddafi started putting out conciliatory feelers. He surrendered two Libyan agents for trial for their role in the bombing. He eventually agreed to pay $2.7 billion in compensation for families of Pan Am victims.

By the late '90s, a full-scale peace offensive was under way. In an interview with author Milton Viorst for Foreign Affairs magazine, the Libyan dictator said of terrorism, "All of these things are of the past, an era that is over." After the Sept. 11 attacks, Qaddafi made a speech expressing sympathy for America, and stressing the need to "eliminate the common dangers of international extremism and terrorism." Libya volunteered antiterrorist intelligence support.

But Libya's rehabilitation and the lifting of sanctions finally came down to the issue of weapons of mass destruction. Libya at first said it didn't have any, neglecting to say it had nuclear and chemical programs under way. The breakthrough came in secret meetings with British and American intelligence officers when Libya was challenged to allow unconditional inspection, and, after some tense exchanges, finally agreed.

Libya itself hastened to make the announcement, leaving it to President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair to follow with their statements of pleasure.

Colonel Qaddafi, often called eccentric, had perceived the way the wind was blowing in a post-cold-war world. If only Saddam Hussein had.

Daniel Schorr is a senior news analyst at National Public Radio.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: epiphany; libya; qaddafi; schorr

1 posted on 12/26/2003 12:34:49 AM PST by mansion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mansion
Daniel Schorr is a senior news analyst at National Public Radio.

Bwa ha ha ha...

Qaddafi agreed to drop his WMDs and allow for inspections because he is scared of George Bush. Anyone who says otherwise is just desperately spinning so they can try to avoid giving Bush any credit for anything.

2 posted on 12/26/2003 12:45:57 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mansion
I would really to know what really happened behind the scenes.
3 posted on 12/26/2003 12:48:00 AM PST by jwh_Denver (Bah Humbug!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver
Perhaps he's finally angling for a promotion to "general".

Hasn't he been a colonel for like 35 years?
4 posted on 12/26/2003 12:52:32 AM PST by mansion ( Ignorantque datos, ne quisquam serviat, enses. - Lucanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Bwa ha ha ha...

Qaddafi agreed to drop his WMDs and allow for inspections because he is scared of George Bush. Anyone who says otherwise is just desperately spinning so they can try to avoid giving Bush any credit for anything.

I heard Schorr deliver himself of this "analysis" on NPR a couple of days ago. I thought it was mild compared to his usual level of clumsily camoflaged vitreol.

It's really a rather silly piece. Note that nothing in it really contradicts your more intellectually honest description. Schorr just tosses the truth into a collander along with some history (well known to anyone who has been paying attention over the past 20 years or so) and his little factoid about how the British were involved (I guess this is supposed to be a courageous blow against any gloating Bushies, although I haven't noticed any of those... G-d knows the Bushies have earned the right) and this is supposed to pass as the "analysis" of "NPR Senior News Analyst Daniel Schorr."

Yawn.

By the way, Senior News Analyst Steely Tom recalls that Daniel Schorr was involved in some pretty nasty/petty skulduggery with regard to The Pentagon Papers case, details of which I cannot remember clearly. That's because I'm a Senior News Analyst.

(steely)

5 posted on 12/26/2003 2:08:03 AM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mansion
The breakthrough came in secret meetings with British and American intelligence officers when Libya was challenged to allow unconditional inspection, and, after some tense exchanges, finally agreed.

But was the "reasoable offer" that Kadaffy couldn't refuse?
6 posted on 12/26/2003 2:58:51 AM PST by polemikos (Kadaffy: I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mansion
IMHO Qaddfi was more persuaded by the hatred for Saddam than any fear. These vicious tyrants fancy themselves beloved by their people, and the realization that they are despised will do more to bring them down than anything else.
7 posted on 12/26/2003 3:23:28 AM PST by tkathy (The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mansion
The key is Iraq and Saddam both. They are free now and that is the signal that is going across the Arab world. If I was an Arab dictator, I would not be comfortable. By aligning himself with the US he is also sending a signal to his people.
8 posted on 12/26/2003 4:11:24 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
"If only Saddam Hussein had."

Am I reading that this asshole misses saddam?

9 posted on 12/26/2003 4:34:03 AM PST by frei_staat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson