Fine. The record says (1) that O'Connor is indeed a leftist wacko and (2) that her wholly uncredentialed opinion on habeas corpus is in conflict with the unanimous agreement of the founding fathers and at least 5 of her predecessor justices, each of whom was immeasurably more qualified to comment on the matter.
She's a Justice on the Supreme Court. Your credentials are better?
Walt
Sandra Day O'connor is ugly and has bad breath.
That she was a frontrunner in the legalization of sodomy, claimed that the constitution would magically transform itself in the next 20 years to prevent afirmative action, and has worked tirelessly to continue the American holocost of abortion is not only her 'record' but her record in the capacity in which she serves the public.
Each example of her radicalism is fair game in discrediting her as a reliable source on the constitutionality of executive suspension of Habeus Corpus.