Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Certainly our soldiers should be honored, but I think even they would agree Bush deserved this particular award. TIME has become in essence a FOREIGN publication.
1 posted on 12/24/2003 8:11:57 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wayoverontheright
Of course leave it to the press to not understand that "soldier" only applies to the Army. That leaves out a lot of other men and women and uniform who are serving over there.
2 posted on 12/24/2003 8:15:27 AM PST by Ex-Dem (Brutality : Faith :: SH : GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
George Bush has class.

The Leftists do not. To coin a word, they are 'classholes.'
4 posted on 12/24/2003 8:25:31 AM PST by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
Excellent, except for what seems to be the obligatory evenhandedness of praising the Democrats.

Harry Truman was NOT a great wartime president. He screwed up in Korea and turned a victory in a stalemate. Far more important, he gave China to Mao Tse Tung.

FDR was a towering presence, but he was arguably more destructive than beneficial to the country he governed for so long. He wrecked the federal system, he wrecked the judicial system, he planted socialist timebombs such as social security in the economy, and while defeating Hitler he handed the world to Stalin instead and paved the way for the rise of Mao. Not a good record.

Conservative columnists seem to have a knee-jerk compulsion to give a little to the other side while arguing their case. Fine. Give credit where credit is due. But please don't give credit where credit is NOT due.
5 posted on 12/24/2003 8:38:49 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
Its so great to have a commander in chief, that us military guys actually respect unlike the last one that didn't even know the proper way to salute. I have no problem with Bush getting man of the year.
6 posted on 12/24/2003 8:42:07 AM PST by libhater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
The American military once again deserves the citizenry's highest esteem, but the American military is not a person.

Time's person of the year is not a tribute. It's mearly a title given by the editors who feel what one person (or thing, or group of people)has most affected the world that year.

Previous "Person('s) of the Year"

1938 - Adolf Hitler

1939 & 1942 - Joseph Stalin

1950 - The fighting man

1956 - Freedom Fighers

1960 - U.S. Scientists

1982 - The computer

1988 - Earth

1992 - Bill Clinton

14 posted on 12/24/2003 6:08:50 PM PST by MetalMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
Agreed, but even our President would want to see the honor accorded to the troops who have responded nobly to his leadership.

Besides, the "classholes" over at DU have their pantyhose in a bunch over this selection by Time. Given their previous selections, I think it went well this year.

15 posted on 12/24/2003 6:19:01 PM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright
The folks at Time think they are so slick, but it is so easy to see through their B.S. They were thinking how can they avoid Bush without seeming biased... the American Troops of course. Liberals will do anything to push an agenda.
16 posted on 12/24/2003 6:23:13 PM PST by Porterville (Every time a liberal speaks an angel is shackled in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson