Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST CHILDREN
Yahoo! News ^ | 12/23/03 | Maggie Gallagher

Posted on 12/23/2003 9:22:46 PM PST by nypokerface

The package came to Austin Ruse's office in Washington, D.C., about a month ago, anonymously. Austin runs a small think tank, The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, whose mission, he says, is to be "a U.N. watchdog on social policy." No doubt that is why the document ended up on his desk. The thing sat on his desk for several days before he realized what a time-bomb someone had sent to him: a secret plan to create an international right to abortion.

The Center for Reproductive Rights apparently realized how damaging the memo is, too. I have in my hand a copy of the letter CRR sent to Austin Ruse, in which CRR (a group of "brilliant, focused, sophisticated lawyers who can fight and win," according to the document) "demands" that he "immediately cease and desist from copying, describing, disseminating, quoting, or in any way using or conveying the information contained in those documents." CRR's hotshot lawyers seem to be under the delusion they can rewrite not only international law, but the First Amendment too. Disclosure of their "proprietary information and trade secrets," the bullies acknowledge, will cause "CRR irreparable harm."

One certainly hopes so.

The document is dripping with contempt for democracy and decency. For example, speaking of the recently enacted partial-birth abortion ban (which passed both the House and Senate with strong majorities), CRR ponders: "What good is all our work if the Bush administration can simply take it all away with the stroke of a pen?"

Deceit is a core part of their strategy. They acknowledge there is no international norm that regards abortion as a basic human right. Even in this country, there is no such social consensus, and the document acknowledges that a growing number of young people appear to reject the idea of abortion as a right.

But who cares about truth or what the signers meant? The goal is to quietly get quasi-judicial tribunals, aka human rights commissions, to start to create an international right to abortion that can then be imposed on vulnerable poor countries dependent on international aid.

You doubt me? Read it for yourself: Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., introduced the entire document into the Dec. 8 Congressional Record (which you can access at www.c-fam.org). He called the plan a "Trojan Horse of deceit," demonstrating "how abortion promotion groups are planning to push abortion here and abroad, not by direct argument, but by twisting words and definition." CRR's document itself concedes, "There is a stealth quality to the work" of creating new international legal norms "without a huge amount of scrutiny ..."

And abortion is just the beginning of CRR's expansive version of "reproductive rights." The CRR's hit list includes schools that do not hand out condoms, and abstinence education programs. They are committed to "staving off efforts to require parental involvement" in abortion. Most hideous of all (and I do not use the word lightly), CRR aims to undo "child abuse reporting requirements" with respect to what it calls "nonabusive" sexual relations with minors. An international right to have sex with young people? No doubt CRR is reacting to the public embarrassment Planned Parenthood faced when journalists discovered that many of its personnel were unwilling to abide by child sex abuse reporting requirements.

The document notes that such sex rights for minors have "always been one of our priority areas," and that "this is a topic about which we can coordinate efforts with our international program." Downsides include: "We will likely have to confront the politically difficult issue of whether minors have a right to have sex."

No wonder so many people around the world hate us. No wonder so many Americans have protested the Supreme Court's recent unconstitutional efforts to base its decisions for us Americans in part on "international law and norms" -- laws and norms that are created by the good folks at places like CRR. Coming soon to a school, home and community near you.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: crr; maggiegallagher

1 posted on 12/23/2003 9:22:46 PM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Henry Lamb (often published on WND) has been on these issues for a long time. He says that NGO arms of the UN put out these extremely controversial missives first to keep the fire away from the UN, but that (as we see here) the UN is indeed the pusher. In ALL senses of the word.
2 posted on 12/23/2003 9:26:42 PM PST by Libertina (Michael Moore is the big bloated weasel in the little spider hole of weasels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface; Avoiding_Sulla; Askel5
Coming soon to a school, home and community near you.

Of this there can be no doubt.

Where do these creeps get their funding? They sure rake in more than their share:

CRR is formerly the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.

Top 10 Recipients of Foundation Grants for Civil Rights and Social Action, circa 2001*

1. Partnership for Caring: Americas Voices for the Dying: $14,371,574

2. National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League Foundation: $12,908,066

3. Center for Reproductive Law and Policy: $8,095,100

4. Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law: $6,180,788

5. Freedom Forum First Amendment Center: $5,726,191

6. National Abortion Federation: $5,395,000

7. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $4,922,400

8. Focus: Hope: $4,812,400

9. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP): $4,330,955

10. Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $$4,272,227

Source: The Foundation Center. *Based on grants of $10,000 or more awarded by a national sample of 1,007 larger U.S. foundations (including 800 of the 1,000 largest ranked by total giving). For community foundations, only discretionary grants are included. Grants to individuals are not included in the file. The search set includes all grants to recipient organizations classified in this topic area and grants to other recipient types for activities classified in this topic area. Grants may therefore be included in more than one topic table, e.g., a grant to a university for its arts program is included in Education, Higher Education, and Arts.

Well, what do you know but they get a goodly chunk of change from Uncle George Soros: $1,750,000 for a four-tiered strategy to defend against "partial birth" abortion legislation and other threats to reproductive rights. The center engages in litigation; education of the legal and activist community; advocacy for universal access to contraception through health insurance; and advocacy for legal access to emergency contraception and mifepristone, the early option pill (1997-2004).
3 posted on 12/23/2003 9:53:54 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
See #3.
4 posted on 12/23/2003 9:54:21 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Good research there, Carry Okie, thank you.. BTW Merry Christmas and a joyous, blessed 2004 to you and your lovely family :)
5 posted on 12/23/2003 10:00:59 PM PST by Libertina (Michael Moore is the big bloated weasel in the little spider hole of weasels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
The Center's (Leftist) Lawyers are probably all NAMBLA, members along with Michael Jackson.
6 posted on 12/23/2003 10:04:42 PM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Thank you. I hope my little talk up there generated some serious thinking.
7 posted on 12/23/2003 10:08:10 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
and where do these foundations get their cash??

McDonalds? Ford Motor Corp? PepsiCo?

8 posted on 12/23/2003 10:29:03 PM PST by GeronL (The Revolution should be televised! Imagine the ratings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Fight Back: www.virtuemedia.org
9 posted on 12/23/2003 10:29:04 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
We love you, C_O :)
10 posted on 12/24/2003 10:43:25 AM PST by Libertina (Michael Moore is the big bloated weasel in the little spider hole of weasels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...

Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

11 posted on 12/26/2003 8:42:13 AM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
UN and other international officials frequent sex slave operations and child prostitution rings, particularly in Eastern Europe and Asia.

They don't care about women and children, just increasing access to their perversions.
12 posted on 12/26/2003 2:13:06 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; cpforlife.org
Soros, eh? It fits. A more contemptible individual can barely be imagined. Imagine the good one could do, if one had his money? The international lobbying power it could give you against tyrants like Mugabe, or the ability to help the needy. Instead, this guy wants to depose George Bush and promote abortion, worldwide. There'll be a special place in hell reserved for Soros.
13 posted on 12/26/2003 2:52:00 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Yeah, I thought that was a rather productive 15 minutes worth of research.

So when you help me get rich and famous in the habitat privatization business in Australia, I promise to do only good stuff. OK? ;-)
14 posted on 12/26/2003 4:03:42 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson